Analysis of vision screening failures in a school-based vision program (2016-19)

被引:14
作者
Milante, Rachel R. [1 ]
Guo, Xinxing [1 ,2 ]
Neitzel, Amanda J. [3 ]
Kretz, Alyssa M. [1 ,2 ]
Mukherjee, M. Rani [1 ,2 ]
Friedman, David S. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Repka, Michael X. [1 ]
Collins, Megan E. [1 ,2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Wilmer Eye Inst, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dana Ctr Prevent Ophthalmol, Wilmer Eye Inst, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Ctr Res & Reform Educ, Sch Educ, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Harvard Med Sch, Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirm, Boston, MA USA
[5] Johns Hopkins Univ, Berman Inst Bioeth, Baltimore, MD USA
来源
JOURNAL OF AAPOS | 2021年 / 25卷 / 01期
关键词
OUTCOMES; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1016/j.jaapos.2020.09.006
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Vision screenings of a school-based program were conducted in state-mandated grades (pre-kindergarten [pre-K] or kindergarten [K], 1st and 8th grade), and nonmandated grades (2nd to 7th). METHODS During school years 2016-19, 51,593 pre-K to 8th grade students from 123 Baltimore City Public Schools underwent vision screenings, with 85% of the schools qualifying for Free and Reduced Price Meals. Assessments included distance visual acuity, Spot photoscreening, stereopsis, and cover testing. Screening failures were analyzed by grade using aggregate data. Failure rates for mandated and nonmandated grades were compared using a logistic regression model, and visual acuity distributions were analyzed using individual data. RESULTS Over the 3-year period, 17,414 (34%) of students failed vision screening. Failure rates by grade ranged from 28% to 38%. Children in kindergarten and 3rd grade and higher were statistically more likely to fail screening than those in 1st grade. Reduced visual acuity was the most common reason for failure (91%). Failure rates were significantly higher in nonmandated grades than in state-mandated testing grades (34.7% vs 32.5% [P < 0.001]). Mean visual acuity of all students who failed vision screening was 20/50 in the worse-seeing eye and was 20/40 in the better-seeing eye. CONCLUSIONS One-third of students failed vision screening. High screening failure rates across all grades suggest that screening in select grade levels, as currently mandated in Maryland schools, is inadequate for detecting vision problems in the low-income communities served by this program.
引用
收藏
页码:29.e1 / 29.e7
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2019, MD ED CODE, Vx, P7
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2009, BUILDING COMPREHENSI
  • [3] Assam Jed H, 2018, S D Med, V71, P224
  • [4] Baltimore City Public Schools, 2020, BALT CIT PUBL SCH DA
  • [5] Vision and the Achievement Gap Among Urban Minority Youth
    Basch, Charles E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SCHOOL HEALTH, 2011, 81 (10) : 599 - 605
  • [6] An analysis of vision screening data from New York City public schools
    Bodack, Marie I.
    Chung, Ida
    Krumholtz, Ira
    [J]. OPTOMETRY-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN OPTOMETRIC ASSOCIATION, 2010, 81 (09) : 476 - 484
  • [7] Guidelines for automated preschool vision screening: A 10-year, evidence-based update
    Donahue, Sean P.
    Arthur, Brian
    Neely, Daniel E.
    Arnold, Robert W.
    Silbert, David
    Ruben, James B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AAPOS, 2013, 17 (01): : 4 - 8
  • [8] Prevalence of Refractive Error among Preschool Children in an Urban Population: The Baltimore Pediatric Eye Disease Study
    Giordano, Lydia
    Friedman, David S.
    Repka, Michael X.
    Katz, Joanne
    Ibironke, Josephine
    Hawes, Patricia
    Tielsch, James M.
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2009, 116 (04) : 739 - 746
  • [9] The Impact of Providing Vision Screening and Free Eyeglasses on Academic Outcomes: Evidence from a Randomized Trial in Title I Elementary Schools in Florida
    Glewwe, Paul
    West, Kristine L.
    Lee, Jongwook
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLICY ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 37 (02) : 265 - 300
  • [10] Missed opportunities: Do states require screening of children for health conditions that interfere with learning?
    Gracy, Delaney
    Fabian, Anupa
    Basch, Corey Hannah
    Scigliano, Maria
    MacLean, Sarah A.
    MacKenzie, Rachel K.
    Redlener, Irwin E.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (01):