Circular economy in corporate sustainability reporting: A review of organisational approaches

被引:80
作者
Opferkuch, Katelin [1 ,2 ]
Caeiro, Sandra [1 ,2 ]
Salomone, Roberta [3 ]
Ramos, Tomas B. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aberta, Dept Sci & Technol, Rua Escola Politecn 147, P-1269001 Lisbon, Portugal
[2] NOVA Univ Lisbon, NOVA Sch Sci & Technol, CENSE, Ctr Environm & Sustainabil Res, Caparica, Portugal
[3] Univ Messina, Dept Econ, Messina, Italy
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
circular economy; content analysis; corporate social responsibility; literature review; reporting framework; sustainable development; SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES; CHANGE MANAGEMENT; INDICATORS; PERSPECTIVES; INTEGRATION; GOVERNANCE; DISCLOSURE; BARRIERS; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1002/bse.2854
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A growing commitment from companies to implement circular economy (CE) strategies demands the development of guidelines for consistent related external communication. The fields of non-financial reporting and sustainability are well established with numerous available international reporting frameworks and approaches; however, there is still an absence of standardised reporting principles and procedures for publishing progress on circularity. In this context, this article aims to explore how companies could include CE within their corporate sustainability reports, through an academic literature review and content analysis of existent reporting approaches. Results showed a clear disconnection between CE and sustainability reporting literature. Overall, only a few of the revised reporting approaches explicitly mention CE, and the guidance given to companies is very general, inconsistent and places the responsibility of selecting performance assessment approaches on the companies. The analysis contributes to identifying opportunities for transparent external communication of CE issues, as well as exploring the challenges and limitations.
引用
收藏
页码:4015 / 4036
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Sustainability reporting and corporate environmentally sustainable investment [J].
Becchetti, Leonardo ;
Mancini, Sara ;
Solferino, Nazaria .
APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2024,
[22]   The complexity and interconnectedness of circular cities and the circular economy for sustainability [J].
Brglez, Kristijan ;
Perc, Matjaz ;
Lukman, Rebeka Kovacic .
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 32 (03) :2049-2065
[23]   Corporate Sustainability Reporting in Europe: A Scoping Review [J].
Dinh, Tami ;
Husmann, Anna ;
Melloni, Gaia .
ACCOUNTING IN EUROPE, 2023, 20 (01) :91-119
[24]   Propelling the Transition to Circular Economy: Exploring the Role of Corporate Circular Economy Performance-Based Incentive Policy [J].
Morrison, Emmanuel A. ;
Adu, Douglas A. ;
Kimani, Danson .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2025, :6024-6053
[25]   The Circular Economy A new sustainability paradigm? [J].
Geissdoerfer, Martin ;
Savaget, Paulo ;
Bocken, Nancy M. P. ;
Hultink, Erik Jan .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 143 :757-768
[26]   What are the drivers of sustainability reporting? A systematic review [J].
Dienes, Dominik ;
Sassen, Remmer ;
Fischer, Jasmin .
SUSTAINABILITY ACCOUNTING MANAGEMENT AND POLICY JOURNAL, 2016, 7 (02) :154-189
[27]   Supply chain collaboration and sustainability performance in circular economy: A systematic literature review [J].
Sudusinghe, Jayani Ishara ;
Seuring, Stefan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2022, 245
[28]   The impact of sustainability reporting quality on the value relevance of corporate sustainability performance [J].
Jadoon, Imran Abbas ;
Ali, Akhter ;
Ayub, Usman ;
Tahir, Muhammad ;
Mumtaz, Raheel .
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2021, 29 (01) :155-175
[29]   Sustainability reporting nexus to corporate governance in scholarly literature [J].
Pasko, Oleh ;
Chen, Fuli ;
Kuts, Tetyana ;
Sharko, Inna ;
Ryzhikova, Natalia .
ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 13 (01) :61-78
[30]   Deconstructing corporate sustainability narratives: A taxonomy for critical assessment of integrated reporting types [J].
Lueg, Klarissa ;
Lueg, Rainer .
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 28 (06) :1785-1800