The effect of concentrate feeding amount and feeding strategy on milk production, dry matter intake, and energy partitioning of autumn-calving Holstein-Friesian cows

被引:28
作者
Lawrence, D. C. [1 ,2 ]
O'Donovan, M. [1 ]
Boland, T. M. [2 ]
Lewis, E. [1 ]
Kennedy, E. [1 ]
机构
[1] TEAGASC, Anim & Grassland Res & Innovat Ctr, Fermoy, Cork, Ireland
[2] Univ Coll Dublin, Sch Agr & Food Sci, Dublin 4, Ireland
关键词
variable feeding; concentrate; feed to yield; energy balance; BODY CONDITION SCORE; HIGH GENETIC MERIT; DAIRY-COWS; GRASS-SILAGE; PATTERNS; SYSTEMS; ALLOCATION; CATTLE; LEVEL; LACTATION;
D O I
10.3168/jds.2014-7905
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to compare the milk production, dry matter intake, and energy partitioning of autumn-calving Holstein-Friesian cows offered a high or low amount of concentrate using 1 of 2 feeding strategies. One hundred and eight autumn-calving Holstein-Friesian cows were blocked based on milk production data from wk 3 and 4 of lactation, and were divided into low-, medium-, and high-milk yield subgroups. Cows were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatments (n = 27) in a 2 x 2 factorial design. Treatment factors were concentrate feeding amount, high concentrate = 7.0 (Hi) or low concentrate = 4.0 kg of DM/cow per day (Lo), and concentrate feeding strategy, flat rate (FR) or group-fed to yield (GFY). In the GFY treatments, cows were allocated concentrate based on their milk yield in the third and fourth weeks of lactation. The lowest-yielding cows (n = 9) received 5.3 and 2.3 kg of DM of concentrate on the Hi and Lo treatments respectively, the highest-yielding cows (n = 9) received 8.7 and 5.7 kg of DM of concentrate on the Hi and Lo treatments respectively, and the average yield cows received the same amount of concentrate as the corresponding FR group (i.e., 7.0 and 4.0 kg of DM of concentrate on the Hi and Lo treatments, respectively). The proportion of forage in the diet was 63% of total dry matter intake (TDMI) for the Hi treatment and 75% of TDMI for the Lo treatment. No significant interaction was noted between concentrate feeding amount and concentrate feeding strategy for dry matter intake or milk yield. Cows on the Hi treatment had a higher TDMI (18.7 +/- 0.36 kg/cow per day) compared with cows on the Lo treatment (15.8 +/- 0.36 kg/cow per day). The milk yield of cows offered the Hi treatment was 1.3 kg/cow per day higher than the milk yield of cows on the Lo treatment (23.8 +/- 0.31 kg/cow per day). Milk solids yield was 0.10 kg/cow per day higher on the Hi treatment than on Lo treatment (1.83 +/- 0.03 kg of DM/cow per day). Cows on the Hi treatment had an estimated net energy demand of 18.0 +/- 0.38 UFL (unite fourragere lait)/cow per day and a net energy intake of 17.6 +/- 0.33 UFL/ cow per day during the experimental period. Cows on the Lo treatment had an energy demand of 16.8 +/- 0.38 UFL/cow per day and an energy intake of 14.9 +/- 0.33 UFL/cow per day. No significant difference in TDMI, milk yield, milk solids yield, or energy balance was observed between the FR and GFY treatments. By increasing the total amount of concentrate offered, cows had higher TDMI and energy intake, which resulted in increased milk production and reduced negative energy balance and body condition score loss.
引用
收藏
页码:338 / 348
页数:11
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] The effect of pasture allowance and concentrate supplementation type on milk production performance and dry matter intake of autumn-calving dairy cows in early lactation
    Pulido, R. G.
    Munoz, R.
    Jara, C.
    Balocchi, O. A.
    Smulders, J. P.
    Wittwer, F.
    Orellana, P.
    O'Donovan, M.
    LIVESTOCK SCIENCE, 2010, 132 (1-3) : 119 - 125
  • [2] The effect of stocking rate and calving date on milk production of Holstein-Friesian dairy cows
    McCarthy, B.
    Delaby, L.
    Pierce, K. M.
    Brennan, A.
    Horan, B.
    LIVESTOCK SCIENCE, 2013, 153 (1-3) : 123 - 134
  • [3] A comparison of individual cow versus group concentrate allocation strategies on dry matter intake, milk production, tissue changes, and fertility of Holstein-Friesian cows offered a grass silage diet
    Little, M. W.
    O'Connell, N. E.
    Ferris, C. P.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2016, 99 (06) : 4360 - 4373
  • [4] Effect of restricting silage feeding prepartum on time of calving, dystocia and stillbirth in Holstein-Friesian cows
    Gleeson, David E.
    O'Brien, Bernadette
    Mee, John F.
    IRISH VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2007, 60 (11) : 667 - 671
  • [5] The effect of daily milk production on the milk composition and energy management indicators in Holstein-Friesian and Simmental cows
    Mlynek, Krzysztof
    Glowinska, Beata
    Salomoliczyk, Ewa
    Tkaczuk, Jolanta
    Stys, Wojciech
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF VETERINARY & ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2018, 42 (04) : 223 - 229
  • [6] Effect of restricting silage feeding prepartum on time of calving, dystocia and stillbirth in Holstein-Friesian cows
    David E. Gleeson
    Bernadette O'Brien
    John F. Mee
    Irish Veterinary Journal, 60
  • [7] Effects of feeding strategy on milk production, reproduction, pasture utilization, and economics of autumn-calving dairy cows in eastern North Carolina
    Vibart, R. E.
    Washburn, S. P.
    Green, J. T., Jr.
    Benson, G. A.
    Williams, C. M.
    Pacheco, D.
    Lopez-Villalobos, N.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2012, 95 (02) : 997 - 1010
  • [8] Dry matter intake and feed efficiency profiles of 3 genotypes of Holstein-Friesian within pasture-based systems of milk production
    Coleman, J.
    Berry, D. P.
    Pierce, K. M.
    Brennan, A.
    Horan, B.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2010, 93 (09) : 4318 - 4331
  • [9] Evaluation of a high-fibre total mixed ration as a dry cow feeding strategy for spring-calving Holstein Friesian dairy cows
    Butler, M.
    Patton, J.
    Murphy, J. J.
    Mulligan, F. J.
    LIVESTOCK SCIENCE, 2011, 136 (2-3) : 85 - 92
  • [10] The effect of strain of Holstein-Friesian, feeding system and parity on lactation curves characteristics of spring-calving dairy cows
    Horan, B
    Dillon, P
    Berry, DP
    O'Connor, P
    Rath, M
    LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2005, 95 (03): : 231 - 241