Accuracy of Seattle Heart Failure Model and HeartMate II Risk Score in Non-Inotrope-Dependent Advanced Heart Failure Patients: Insights From the ROADMAP Study (Risk Assessment and Comparative Effectiveness of Left Ventricular Assist Device and Medical Management in Ambulatory Heart Failure Patients)

被引:26
作者
Lanfear, David E. [1 ]
Levy, Wayne C. [2 ]
Stehlik, Josef [3 ]
Estep, Jerry D. [4 ]
Rogers, Joseph G. [5 ]
Shah, Keyur B. [6 ]
Boyle, Andrew J. [7 ]
Chuang, Joyce [8 ]
Farrar, David J. [8 ]
Starling, Randall C. [9 ]
机构
[1] Henry Ford Hosp, 2799 W Grand Blvd,K14, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Univ Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[4] Houston Methodist Hosp, Houston, TX USA
[5] Duke Univ, Durham, NC USA
[6] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Richmond, VA 23284 USA
[7] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Univ Hosp, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[8] St Jude Med, Pleasanton, CA USA
[9] Cleveland Clin, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
area under the curve; death; heart failure; survival analysis; DRUG ADMINISTRATION-APPROVAL; INTERAGENCY REGISTRY; PREDICTING SURVIVAL; DESTINATION THERAPY; CIRCULATORY SUPPORT; TRANSPLANTATION; MORTALITY; OUTCOMES; BRIDGE; FOOD;
D O I
10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.116.003745
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Timing of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation in advanced heart failure patients not on inotropes is unclear. Relevant prediction models exist (SHFM [Seattle Heart Failure Model] and HMRS [HeartMate II Risk Score]), but use in this group is not established. Methods and Results ROADMAP (Risk Assessment and Comparative Effectiveness of Left Ventricular Assist Device and Medical Management in Ambulatory Heart Failure Patients) is a prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized study of 200 advanced heart failure patients not on inotropes who met indications for LVAD implantation, comparing the effectiveness of HeartMate II support versus optimal medical management. We compared SHFM-predicted versus observed survival (overall survival and LVAD-free survival) in the optimal medical management arm (n=103) and HMRS-predicted versus observed survival in all LVAD patients (n=111) using Cox modeling, receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curves, and calibration plots. In the optimal medical management cohort, the SHFM was a significant predictor of survival (hazard ratio=2.98; P<0.001; ROC area under the curve=0.71; P<0.001) but not LVAD-free survival (hazard ratio=1.41; P=0.097; ROC area under the curve=0.56; P=0.314). SHFM showed adequate calibration for survival but overestimated LVAD-free survival. In the LVAD cohort, the HMRS had marginal discrimination at 3 (Cox P=0.23; ROC area under the curve=0.71; P=0.026) and 12 months (Cox P=0.036; ROC area under the curve=0.62; P=0.122), but calibration was poor, underestimating survival across time and risk subgroups. Conclusions In non-inotrope-dependent advanced heart failure patients receiving optimal medical management, the SHFM was predictive of overall survival but underestimated the risk of clinical worsening and LVAD implantation. Among LVAD patients, the HMRS had marginal discrimination and underestimated survival post-LVAD implantation. Clinical Trial Registration URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01452802.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] The HeartMate Risk Score Identifies Patients With Similar Mortality Risk Across All INTERMACS Profiles in a Large Multicenter Analysis
    Adamo, Luigi
    Tang, Yuanyuan
    Nassif, Michael E.
    Novak, Eric
    Jones, Philip G.
    LaRue, Shane
    Spertus, John A.
    Mann, Douglas L.
    [J]. JACC-HEART FAILURE, 2016, 4 (12) : 950 - 958
  • [2] Risk Prediction Models for Mortality in Ambulatory Patients With Heart Failure A Systematic Review
    Alba, Ana C.
    Agoritsas, Thomas
    Jankowski, Milosz
    Courvoisier, Delphine
    Walter, Stephen D.
    Guyatt, Gordon H.
    Ross, Heather J.
    [J]. CIRCULATION-HEART FAILURE, 2013, 6 (05) : 881 - 889
  • [3] Clinical outcomes for continuous-flow left ventricular assist device patients stratified by pre-operative INTERMACS classification
    Boyle, Andrew J.
    Ascheim, Deborah D.
    Russo, Mark J.
    Kormos, Robert L.
    John, Ranjit
    Naka, Yoshifumi
    Gelijns, Annetine C.
    Hong, Kimberly N.
    Teuteberg, Jeffrey J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2011, 30 (04) : 402 - 407
  • [4] Predicting Survival in Patients Receiving Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices The HeartMate II Risk Score
    Cowger, Jennifer
    Sundareswaran, Kartik
    Rogers, Joseph G.
    Park, Soon J.
    Pagani, Francis D.
    Bhat, Geetha
    Jaski, Brian
    Farrar, David J.
    Slaughter, Mark S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 61 (03) : 313 - 321
  • [5] The HeartMate II Risk Score: An Adjusted Score for Evaluation of All Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices
    Cowger, Jennifer Ann
    Castle, Lindsay
    Aaronson, Keith David
    Slaughter, Mark S.
    Moainie, Sina
    Walsh, Mary
    Salerno, Christopher
    [J]. ASAIO JOURNAL, 2016, 62 (03) : 281 - 285
  • [6] Incremental and independent value of cardiopulmonary exercise test measures and the Seattle Heart Failure Model for prediction of risk in patients with heart failure
    Dardas, Todd
    Li, Yanhong
    Reed, Shelby D.
    O'Connor, Christopher M.
    Whellan, David J.
    Ellis, Stephen J.
    Schulman, Kevin A.
    Kraus, William E.
    Forman, Daniel E.
    Levy, Wayne C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 34 (08) : 1017 - 1023
  • [7] Risk Assessment and Comparative Effectiveness of Left Ventricular Assist Device and Medical Management in Ambulatory Heart Failure Patients Results From the ROADMAP Study
    Estep, Jerry D.
    Starling, Randall C.
    Horstmanshof, Douglas A.
    Milano, Carmelo A.
    Selzman, Craig H.
    Shah, Keyur B.
    Loebe, Matthias
    Moazami, Nader
    Long, James W.
    Stehlik, Josef
    Kasirajan, Vigneshwar
    Haas, Donald C.
    O'Connell, John B.
    Boyle, Andrew J.
    Farrar, David J.
    Rogers, Joseph G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 66 (16) : 1747 - 1761
  • [8] Application of the Seattle Heart Failure Model in Ambulatory Patients Presented to an Advanced Heart Failure Therapeutics Committee
    Gorodeski, Eiran Z.
    Chu, Eric C.
    Chow, Chen H.
    Levy, Wayne C.
    Hsich, Eileen
    Starling, Randall C.
    [J]. CIRCULATION-HEART FAILURE, 2010, 3 (06) : 706 - +
  • [9] Improved survival and decreasing incidence of adverse events with the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device as bridge-to-transplant therapy
    John, Ranjit
    Kamdar, Forum
    Liao, Kenneth
    Colvin-Adams, Monica
    Boyle, Andrew
    Joyce, Lyle
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2008, 86 (04) : 1227 - 1235
  • [10] Results of the Destination Therapy Post-Food and Drug Administration Approval Study With a Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device A Prospective Study Using the INTERMACS Registry (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support)
    Jorde, Ulrich P.
    Kushwaha, Sudhir S.
    Tatooles, Antone J.
    Naka, Yoshifumi
    Bhat, Geetha
    Long, James W.
    Horstmanshof, Douglas A.
    Kormos, Robert L.
    Teuteberg, Jeffrey J.
    Slaughter, Mark S.
    Birks, Emma J.
    Farrar, David J.
    Park, Soon J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 63 (17) : 1751 - 1757