Communication and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas: A Meta-Analytic Review

被引:310
作者
Balliet, Daniel [1 ]
机构
[1] Singapore Management Univ, Sch Social Sci, Singapore 178903, Singapore
关键词
social dilemmas; communication; cooperation; conflict; meta-analysis; PRISONERS-DILEMMA; GROUP-SIZE; GROUP IDENTITY; BEHAVIOR; COMMITMENT; COVENANTS;
D O I
10.1177/0022002709352443
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
Among the most researched solutions to social dilemmas is communication. Since the late 1950s, it has been well known that communication enhances cooperation in social dilemmas. This article reports a meta-analysis of this literature (forty-five effect sizes) and finds a large positive effect of communication on cooperation in social dilemmas (d = 1.01). This effect is moderated by the type of communication, with a stronger effect of face-to- face discussion (d = 1.21) compared to written messages (d = 0.46). The communication-cooperation relationship is also stronger in larger, compared to smaller, group social dilemmas. Whether communication occurred before or during iterated dilemmas did not statistically affect the communication-cooperation effect size. Results are discussed according to theory and research on communication in social dilemmas.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 57
页数:19
相关论文
共 73 条
[41]   Social dilemmas: The anatomy of cooperation [J].
Kollock, P .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, 1998, 24 :183-214
[42]  
Komorita S.S., 1994, SOCIAL DILEMMAS
[43]   The social psychophysics of cooperation: Nonverbal communication in a public goods game [J].
Kurzban, R .
JOURNAL OF NONVERBAL BEHAVIOR, 2001, 25 (04) :241-259
[44]  
LEVON Z, 2009, GROUP DYADIC C UNPUB
[46]  
Lipsey M. W., 2001, Practical meta-analysis
[47]  
LOOMIS JL, 1959, HUM RELAT, V4, P305
[48]  
Lubell M., 2008, GROUP SIZE SIN UNPUB
[49]   COOPERATION AND INTERPERSONAL RISK [J].
MARWELL, G ;
SCHMITT, DR ;
SHOTOLA, R .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1971, 18 (01) :9-+
[50]  
MERMIN LS, 1976, DISS ABSTR INT