Immediate Loading of Postextraction Implants in the Esthetic Area: Systematic Review of the Literature

被引:51
|
作者
Del Fabbro, Massimo [1 ]
Ceresoli, Valentina [1 ]
Taschieri, Silvio [1 ]
Ceci, Caterina [1 ]
Testori, Tiziano
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Dept Biomed Surg & Dent Sci, CRSO, IRCCS,Galeazzi Orthoped Inst, I-20161 Milan, Italy
关键词
dental implants; immediate implants; immediate loading; postextraction socket; systematic review; SINGLE-TOOTH IMPLANTS; FRESH EXTRACTION SOCKETS; PERIODONTALLY INFECTED SITES; PLATELET-RICH PLASMA; RECOMMENDED CLINICAL PROCEDURES; GINGIVAL TISSUE STABILITY; HEALED ALVEOLAR RIDGES; 1-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; SOFT-TISSUE; DENTAL IMPLANTS;
D O I
10.1111/cid.12074
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
PurposeThe purpose of the present systematic review was to estimate the survival rate of implants placed in fresh extraction sockets and immediately restored. Secondary aims were to compare it with the survival rate of implants placed in healed ridges and of implants restored according to a delayed protocol as well as to assess the influence of several other confounding factors on the clinical outcomes. MethodsAn electronic search was performed on MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases in order to identify prospective clinical studies published from 1990 to October 2012. A hand search was also done. Studies were selected according to specific inclusion criteria. The effect of the following parameters on 1-year implant survival (IS) was statistically evaluated: study design, risk of bias, prosthesis type, type of loading (occlusal or nonocclusal), type of incision (flap or flapless), presence of infection, and grafting material. A meta-analysis of studies comparing immediately restored implants placed in fresh postextraction sockets versus healed ridges was conducted. ResultsSeven randomized trials, three controlled trials, and 35 case series were included, accounting for 1170 patients and 1974 postextraction implants immediately restored. Twenty-eight studies had a low risk of bias. The overall 1-year IS was 97.6%. All failures occurred within 1 year of function. Meta-analysis showed a significant better outcome for implants placed in healed ridge (IS=99.4%) as compared with postextraction implants (IS=95.6%). No other parameter had a significant effect on clinical outcomes. Most variables, among which the esthetic aspect, could not be assessed as they were not systematically reported. ConclusionThough the conventional protocol still represents the gold standard, immediate restoration of implants placed in fresh extraction sites displayed an excellent implant prognosis. Such clinical approach can be successfully adopted in order to minimize the treatment time with a relevant impact on patient's satisfaction.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 70
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Immediate implant placement and immediate loading in the esthetic area A literature review
    Kallab, Sandra
    Obreja, Karina
    Schwarz, Frank
    Parvini, Puria
    IMPLANTOLOGIE, 2024, 32 (04): : 433 - 446
  • [2] Immediate Loading of Tapered Implants Placed in Postextraction Sockets and Healed Sites
    Han, Chang-Hun
    Mangano, Francesco
    Mortellaro, Carmen
    Park, Kwang-Bum
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2016, 27 (05) : 1220 - 1227
  • [3] Immediate Placement of Dental Implants in the Esthetic Zone: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis
    Slagter, Kirsten W.
    den Hartog, Laurens
    Bakker, Nicolaas A.
    Vissink, Arjan
    Meijer, Henny J. A.
    Raghoebar, Gerry M.
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2014, 85 (07) : E241 - E250
  • [4] Tilted Implants in the Immediate Loading Rehabilitation of the Maxilla: A Systematic Review
    Menini, M.
    Signori, A.
    Tealdo, T.
    Bevilacqua, M.
    Pera, F.
    Ravera, G.
    Pera, P.
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2012, 91 (09) : 821 - 827
  • [5] Comparison of clinical esthetic outcomes of immediately placed implants with and without immediate provisionalization in single-tooth implants of the esthetic area: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Dong, Jianyong
    Mao, Chunmei
    Xu, Jie
    He, Yanting
    Zhang, Kaiqi
    Cui, Jun
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (10):
  • [6] Clinical and Esthetic Outcomes of Implants Placed in Postextraction Sites
    Chen, Stephen T.
    Buser, Daniel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2009, 24 : 186 - 217
  • [7] Success of immediate loading implants compared to conventionally-loaded implants: a literature review
    Al-Sawai, Abdul-Aziz
    Labib, Hussein
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL DENTISTRY, 2016, 7 (03) : 217 - 224
  • [8] A systematic review of marginal soft tissue at implants subjected to immediate loading or immediate restoration
    Glauser, Roland
    Zembic, Ania
    Hammerle, Christoph H. F.
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2006, 17 : 82 - 92
  • [9] Immediate Placement of Implants Into Infected Sites: A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Waasdorp, Jonathan A.
    Evian, Cyril I.
    Mandracchia, Martine
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2010, 81 (06) : 801 - 808
  • [10] The soft tissue esthetic outcome with and without immediate provisionalization in immediate implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sutariya, Priyanka
    Mehta, Shruti
    Upadhyay, Hemil
    Pathan, Mansoorkhan
    Patel, Surbhi
    Bhatia, Yashpreetsingh
    JOURNAL OF INDIAN PROSTHODONTIC SOCIETY, 2022, 22 (01): : 2 - 12