Immediate Loading of Postextraction Implants in the Esthetic Area: Systematic Review of the Literature

被引:51
作者
Del Fabbro, Massimo [1 ]
Ceresoli, Valentina [1 ]
Taschieri, Silvio [1 ]
Ceci, Caterina [1 ]
Testori, Tiziano
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Dept Biomed Surg & Dent Sci, CRSO, IRCCS,Galeazzi Orthoped Inst, I-20161 Milan, Italy
关键词
dental implants; immediate implants; immediate loading; postextraction socket; systematic review; SINGLE-TOOTH IMPLANTS; FRESH EXTRACTION SOCKETS; PERIODONTALLY INFECTED SITES; PLATELET-RICH PLASMA; RECOMMENDED CLINICAL PROCEDURES; GINGIVAL TISSUE STABILITY; HEALED ALVEOLAR RIDGES; 1-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; SOFT-TISSUE; DENTAL IMPLANTS;
D O I
10.1111/cid.12074
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
PurposeThe purpose of the present systematic review was to estimate the survival rate of implants placed in fresh extraction sockets and immediately restored. Secondary aims were to compare it with the survival rate of implants placed in healed ridges and of implants restored according to a delayed protocol as well as to assess the influence of several other confounding factors on the clinical outcomes. MethodsAn electronic search was performed on MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases in order to identify prospective clinical studies published from 1990 to October 2012. A hand search was also done. Studies were selected according to specific inclusion criteria. The effect of the following parameters on 1-year implant survival (IS) was statistically evaluated: study design, risk of bias, prosthesis type, type of loading (occlusal or nonocclusal), type of incision (flap or flapless), presence of infection, and grafting material. A meta-analysis of studies comparing immediately restored implants placed in fresh postextraction sockets versus healed ridges was conducted. ResultsSeven randomized trials, three controlled trials, and 35 case series were included, accounting for 1170 patients and 1974 postextraction implants immediately restored. Twenty-eight studies had a low risk of bias. The overall 1-year IS was 97.6%. All failures occurred within 1 year of function. Meta-analysis showed a significant better outcome for implants placed in healed ridge (IS=99.4%) as compared with postextraction implants (IS=95.6%). No other parameter had a significant effect on clinical outcomes. Most variables, among which the esthetic aspect, could not be assessed as they were not systematically reported. ConclusionThough the conventional protocol still represents the gold standard, immediate restoration of implants placed in fresh extraction sites displayed an excellent implant prognosis. Such clinical approach can be successfully adopted in order to minimize the treatment time with a relevant impact on patient's satisfaction.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 70
页数:19
相关论文
共 179 条
  • [1] Ahn JJ, 2008, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V23, P1133
  • [2] Anitua E, 1999, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V14, P529
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1998, PRACT PERIODONTICS A
  • [4] Modeling of the buccal and lingual bone walls of fresh extraction sites following implant installation
    Araujo, Mauricio G.
    Wennstroem, Jan L.
    Lindhe, Jan
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2006, 17 (06) : 606 - 614
  • [5] Ridge alterations following tooth extraction with and without flap elevation: an experimental study in the dog
    Araujo, Mauricio G.
    Lindhe, Jan
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2009, 20 (06) : 545 - 549
  • [6] Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction.: An experimental study in the dog
    Araújo, MG
    Lindhe, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2005, 32 (02) : 212 - 218
  • [7] Porous bovine bone mineral in healing of human extraction sockets. part 1: Histomorphometric evaluations at 9 months
    Artzi, Z
    Tal, H
    Dayan, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2000, 71 (06) : 1015 - 1023
  • [8] Porous bovine bone mineral in healing of human extraction sockets: 2. Histochemical observations at 9 months
    Artzi, Z
    Tal, H
    Dayan, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2001, 72 (02) : 152 - 159
  • [9] Immediate restoration/loading of immediately placed single implants: is it an effective bimodal approach?
    Atieh, Momen A.
    Payne, Alan G. T.
    Duncan, Warwick J.
    Cullinan, Mary P.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2009, 20 (07) : 645 - 659
  • [10] A Prospective Analysis of Immediate Provisionalization of Single Implants
    Balshi, Thomas J.
    Wolfinger, Glenn J.
    Wulc, Daniel
    Balshi, Stephen F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2011, 20 (01): : 10 - 15