Lessons Learned and Future Directions of MetaTutor: Leveraging Multichannel Data to Scaffold Self-Regulated Learning With an Intelligent Tutoring System

被引:78
作者
Azevedo, Roger [1 ]
Bouchet, Francois [2 ]
Duffy, Melissa [3 ]
Harley, Jason [4 ,5 ]
Taub, Michelle [1 ]
Trevors, Gregory [3 ]
Cloude, Elizabeth [6 ]
Dever, Daryn [1 ]
Wiedbusch, Megan [1 ]
Wortha, Franz [7 ]
Cerezo, Rebeca [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cent Florida, Sch Modeling Simulat & Training, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
[2] Sorbonne Univ, Lab Informat Paris 6 LIP6, Paris, France
[3] Univ South Carolina, Educ Studies, Columbia, SC USA
[4] McGill Univ, Fac Med, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[5] McGill Univ Hlth Ctr, Res Inst, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[6] Soar Technol Inc, Orlando, FL USA
[7] Univ Greifswald, Inst Psychol, Greifswald, Germany
[8] Univ Oviedo, Dept Psychol, Oviedo, Spain
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
self-regulated learning; learning; multimodal data; intelligent tutoring systems; scaffolding; metacognition; trace data; pedagogical agents; PEDAGOGICAL AGENTS; EMOTION REGULATION; ACHIEVEMENT GOALS; PRIOR KNOWLEDGE; NOTE-TAKING; MOTIVATION; HYPERMEDIA; FRAMEWORK; MODEL; TECHNOLOGIES;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2022.813632
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Self-regulated learning (SRL) is critical for learning across tasks, domains, and contexts. Despite its importance, research shows that not all learners are equally skilled at accurately and dynamically monitoring and regulating their self-regulatory processes. Therefore, learning technologies, such as intelligent tutoring systems (ITSs), have been designed to measure and foster SRL. This paper presents an overview of over 10 years of research on SRL with MetaTutor, a hypermedia-based ITS designed to scaffold college students' SRL while they learn about the human circulatory system. MetaTutor's architecture and instructional features are designed based on models of SRL, empirical evidence on human and computerized tutoring principles of multimedia learning, Artificial Intelligence (AI) in educational systems for metacognition and SRL, and research on SRL from our team and that of other researchers. We present MetaTutor followed by a synthesis of key research findings on the effectiveness of various versions of the system (e.g., adaptive scaffolding vs. no scaffolding of self-regulatory behavior) on learning outcomes. First, we focus on findings from self-reports, learning outcomes, and multimodal data (e.g., log files, eye tracking, facial expressions of emotion, screen recordings) and their contributions to our understanding of SRL with an ITS. Second, we elaborate on the role of embedded pedagogical agents (PAs) as external regulators designed to scaffold learners' cognitive and metacognitive SRL strategy use. Third, we highlight and elaborate on the contributions of multimodal data in measuring and understanding the role of cognitive, affective, metacognitive, and motivational (CAMM) processes. Additionally, we unpack some of the challenges these data pose for designing real-time instructional interventions that scaffold SRL. Fourth, we present existing theoretical, methodological, and analytical challenges and briefly discuss lessons learned and open challenges.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 153 条
[21]   Process mining techniques for analysing patterns and strategies in students' self-regulated learning [J].
Bannert, Maria ;
Reimann, Peter ;
Sonnenberg, Christoph .
METACOGNITION AND LEARNING, 2014, 9 (02) :161-185
[22]   A Framework for Designing Scaffolds That Improve Motivation and Cognition [J].
Belland, Brian R. ;
Kim, ChanMin ;
Hannafin, Michael J. .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 2013, 48 (04) :243-270
[23]   When Are Mastery Goals More Adaptive? It Depends on Experiences of Autonomy Support and Autonomy [J].
Benita, Moti ;
Roth, Guy ;
Deci, Edward L. .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 106 (01) :258-267
[24]  
Biswas G., 2018, Handbook of selfregulation of learning and performance, V2nd, P388, DOI [DOI 10.4324/9781315697048, 10.4324/9781315697048-25]
[25]   From Design to Implementation to Practice a Learning by Teaching System: Betty's Brain [J].
Biswas G. ;
Segedy J.R. ;
Bunchongchit K. .
International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2016, 26 (01) :350-364
[26]   How college science students engage in note-taking strategies [J].
Bonner, Janice M. ;
Holliday, William G. .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 2006, 43 (08) :786-818
[27]  
Bouchet F., 2012, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, P65
[28]  
Bouchet F., 2013, Journal of Educational Data Mining, V5, P104, DOI [10.5281/zenodo.3554613, DOI 10.5281/ZENODO.3554613]
[29]   Evaluating Adaptive Pedagogical Agents' Prompting Strategies Effect on Students' Emotions [J].
Bouchet, Francois ;
Harley, Jason M. ;
Azevedo, Roger .
INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEMS, ITS 2018, 2018, 10858 :33-43
[30]   Can Adaptive Pedagogical Agents' Prompting Strategies Improve Students' Learning and Self-Regulation? [J].
Bouchet, Francois ;
Harley, Jason M. ;
Azevedo, Roger .
INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEMS, ITS 2016, 2016, 9684 :368-374