The Role of Parallel Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Map Values for Evaluating Breast Lesions: Preliminary Results

被引:39
作者
Jin, Guangwei [1 ,2 ]
An, Ningyu [3 ]
Jacobs, Michael A. [4 ,5 ]
Li, Kuncheng [1 ]
机构
[1] Capital Med Univ, Dept Radiol, Xuanwu Hosp, Beijing 100053, Peoples R China
[2] Meitan Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Beijing 100028, Peoples R China
[3] Peoples Liberat Army Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Russell H Morgan Dept Radiol & Radiol Sci, Baltimore, MD USA
[5] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Sidney Kimmel Comprehens Canc Ctr, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI); MRI; breast carcinoma; apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map; B-VALUES; TUMORS; CELLULARITY; PERFUSION; DIFFERENTIATION; CARCINOMA; GLIOMAS; CANCER; BRAIN; MRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.acra.2009.12.004
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility of using diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with an array spatial sensitivity encoding technique (ASSET) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map values with different b values to distinguish benign and malignant breast lesions. Materials and Methods: Fifty-six female patients with 60 histologically proven breast lesions and 20 healthy volunteers underwent magnetic resonance imaging. A subset of normal volunteers (n = 7) and patients (n = 16) underwent both conventional DWI and ASSET-DWI, and the image quality between the two methods was compared. Finally, ASSET-DWI with b = 0, 600 s/mm(2), and b = 0, 1000 s/mm(2), were compared for their ability to distinguish benign and malignant breast lesions. Results: The ASSET-DWI method had less distortion, fewer artifacts, and a lower acquisition time than other methods. No significant difference (P > .05) was detected in ADC map values between ASSET-DWI and conventional DWI. For ASSET-DWI, the sensitivity of ADC values for malignant lesions with a threshold of less than 1.44 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s (b = 600 s/mm(2)) and 1.18 x 10-3 mm(2)/s (b = 1000 s/mm(2)) was 80% and 77.5%, respectively. The specificity of both groups was 95%. Conclusion: ASSET-DWI evaluation of breast tissue offers decreased distortion, susceptibility to artifacts, and acquisition time relative to other methods. The use of ASSET-DWI is feasible with b values ranging from 600 to 1000 s/mm(2) and provides increased specificity compared to other techniques. Thus, the ADC value of a breast lesion can be used to further characterize malignant lesions from benign ones.
引用
收藏
页码:456 / 463
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of lung lesions: repeatability of the apparent diffusion coefficient measurement
    Bernardin, L.
    Douglas, N. H. M.
    Collins, D. J.
    Giles, S. L.
    O'Flynn, E. A. M.
    Orton, M.
    deSouza, N. M.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2014, 24 (02) : 502 - 511
  • [22] COMPARISON OF APPARENT DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT IN DIFFUSION-WEIGHTED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING AND MORPHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF BREAST TUMORS
    Pawlik, Tomasz
    Rys, Janusz
    POLISH JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2016, 67 (04) : 398 - 403
  • [23] Can Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Related Apparent Diffusion Coefficient be a Prognostic Value in Women With Breast Cancer?
    Rabasco, Paola
    Caivano, Rocchina
    Simeon, Vittorio
    Dinardo, Giuseppina
    Lotumolo, Antonella
    Gioioso, Matilde
    Villonio, Antonio
    Iannelli, Giancarlo
    D'Antuono, Felice
    Zandolino, Alexis
    Macarini, Luca
    Guglielmi, Giuseppe
    Cammarota, Aldo
    CANCER INVESTIGATION, 2017, 35 (02) : 92 - 99
  • [24] Diffusion-weighted imaging of normal fibroglandular breast tissue: influence of microperfusion and fat suppression technique on the apparent diffusion coefficient
    Baron, Paul
    Dorrius, Monique D.
    Kappert, Peter
    Oudkerk, Matthijs
    Sijens, Paul E.
    NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2010, 23 (04) : 399 - 405
  • [25] Diagnostic Usefulness of Combination of Diffusion-weighted Imaging and T2WI, Including Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Breast Lesions: Assessment of Histologic Grade
    Kim, Keum Won
    Kuzmiak, Cherie M.
    Kim, Young Joong
    Seo, Jae Young
    Jung, Hae Kyoung
    Lee, Mu-Sik
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2018, 25 (05) : 643 - 652
  • [26] Application of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in the Detection of Active Sacroiliitis and the Comparison of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Relative Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values
    Toslak, Iclal Erdem
    Bilgilisoy Filiz, Meral
    Cekic, Bulent
    Parlak, Ayse Eda
    Cay, Hasan Fatih
    Yildiz, Sevim
    Erol, Bekir
    Ozel, Deniz
    Sezer, Ilhan
    ARCHIVES OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2016, 31 (03): : 254 - 264
  • [27] Apparent diffusion coefficient values and non-homogeneity of diffusion in brain tumors in diffusion-weighted MRI
    Basirjafari, Sedigheh
    Poureisa, Masoud
    Shahhoseini, Babak
    Zarei, Mohammad
    Neshin, Saeideh Aghayari Sheikh
    Aria, Sheida Anvari
    Nouri-Vaskeh, Masoud
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2020, 61 (02) : 244 - 252
  • [28] Diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for detection of malignanat vertebral bone marrow lesions
    Filograna, L.
    Magarelli, N.
    Cellini, F.
    Manfrida, S.
    Leone, A.
    Colosimo, C.
    Valentini, V.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 22 (03) : 590 - 597
  • [29] Apparent diffusion coefficient values of diffusion-weighted imaging for distinguishing focal pulmonary lesions and characterizing the subtype of lung cancer: a meta-analysis
    Shen, Guohua
    Jia, Zhiyun
    Deng, Houfu
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2016, 26 (02) : 556 - 566
  • [30] Diffusion-weighted imaging in breast cancer: relationship between apparent diffusion coefficient and tumour aggressiveness
    Costantini, M.
    Belli, P.
    Rinaldi, P.
    Bufi, E.
    Giardina, G.
    Franceschini, G.
    Petrone, G.
    Bonomo, L.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2010, 65 (12) : 1005 - 1012