The Role of Parallel Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Map Values for Evaluating Breast Lesions: Preliminary Results

被引:39
作者
Jin, Guangwei [1 ,2 ]
An, Ningyu [3 ]
Jacobs, Michael A. [4 ,5 ]
Li, Kuncheng [1 ]
机构
[1] Capital Med Univ, Dept Radiol, Xuanwu Hosp, Beijing 100053, Peoples R China
[2] Meitan Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Beijing 100028, Peoples R China
[3] Peoples Liberat Army Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Russell H Morgan Dept Radiol & Radiol Sci, Baltimore, MD USA
[5] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Sidney Kimmel Comprehens Canc Ctr, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI); MRI; breast carcinoma; apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map; B-VALUES; TUMORS; CELLULARITY; PERFUSION; DIFFERENTIATION; CARCINOMA; GLIOMAS; CANCER; BRAIN; MRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.acra.2009.12.004
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility of using diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with an array spatial sensitivity encoding technique (ASSET) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map values with different b values to distinguish benign and malignant breast lesions. Materials and Methods: Fifty-six female patients with 60 histologically proven breast lesions and 20 healthy volunteers underwent magnetic resonance imaging. A subset of normal volunteers (n = 7) and patients (n = 16) underwent both conventional DWI and ASSET-DWI, and the image quality between the two methods was compared. Finally, ASSET-DWI with b = 0, 600 s/mm(2), and b = 0, 1000 s/mm(2), were compared for their ability to distinguish benign and malignant breast lesions. Results: The ASSET-DWI method had less distortion, fewer artifacts, and a lower acquisition time than other methods. No significant difference (P > .05) was detected in ADC map values between ASSET-DWI and conventional DWI. For ASSET-DWI, the sensitivity of ADC values for malignant lesions with a threshold of less than 1.44 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s (b = 600 s/mm(2)) and 1.18 x 10-3 mm(2)/s (b = 1000 s/mm(2)) was 80% and 77.5%, respectively. The specificity of both groups was 95%. Conclusion: ASSET-DWI evaluation of breast tissue offers decreased distortion, susceptibility to artifacts, and acquisition time relative to other methods. The use of ASSET-DWI is feasible with b values ranging from 600 to 1000 s/mm(2) and provides increased specificity compared to other techniques. Thus, the ADC value of a breast lesion can be used to further characterize malignant lesions from benign ones.
引用
收藏
页码:456 / 463
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The role of diffusion-weighted imaging and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for breast tumors
    Park, Mi Jung
    Cha, Eun Suk
    Kang, Bong Joo
    Ihn, Yon Kwon
    Baik, Jun Hyun
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2007, 8 (05) : 390 - 396
  • [2] Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast lesions: Region-of-interest placement and different ADC parameters influence apparent diffusion coefficient values
    Bickel, Hubert
    Pinker, Katja
    Polanec, Stephan
    Magometschnigg, Heinrich
    Wengert, Georg
    Spick, Claudio
    Bogner, Wolfgang
    Bago-Horvath, Zsuzsanna
    Helbich, Thomas H.
    Baltzer, Pascal
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2017, 27 (05) : 1883 - 1892
  • [3] Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the breast: comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient values of normal breast tissue with benign and malignant breast lesions
    Orguc, Sebnem
    Basara, Isil
    Coskun, Teoman
    SINGAPORE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 53 (11) : 737 - 743
  • [4] The diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted imaging and the apparent diffusion coefficient values in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions
    Cabuk, Gonca
    Duce, Meltem Nass
    Ozgur, Anil
    Apaydin, Feramuz Demir
    Polat, Ayse
    Orekici, Gulhan
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2015, 59 (02) : 141 - 148
  • [5] Differentiation of Breast Lesions and Distinguishing Their Histological Subtypes Using Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and ADC Values
    Maric, Jelena
    Boban, Jasmina
    Ivkovic-Kapicl, Tatjana
    Djilas, Dragana
    Vucaj-Cirilovic, Viktorija
    Bogdanovic-Stojanovic, Dragana
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 10
  • [6] Evaluating Spinal Canal Lesions Using Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Maps with Diffusion-Weighted Imaging
    Kanamoto, Hirohito
    Norimoto, Masaki
    Eguchi, Yawara
    Oikawa, Yasuhiro
    Orita, Sumihisa
    Inage, Kazuhide
    Abe, Koki
    Inoue, Masahiro
    Kinoshita, Hideyuki
    Umimura, Tomotaka
    Matsumoto, Koji
    Masuda, Yoshitada
    Furuya, Takeo
    Koda, Masao
    Aoki, Yasuchika
    Watanabe, Atsuya
    Takahashi, Kazuhisa
    Ohtori, Seiji
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2020, 14 (03) : 312 - 319
  • [7] Contribution of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and ADC Values to Papillary Breast Lesions
    Lv, Wenjie
    Zheng, Dawen
    Guan, Wenbin
    Wu, Ping
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [8] Diffusion Weighted Imaging and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in 3 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Breast Lesions
    Caivano, Rocchina
    Villonio, Antonio
    D'Antuono, Felice
    Gioioso, Matilde
    Rabasco, Paola
    Iannelli, Giancarlo
    Zandolino, Alexis
    Lotumolo, Antonella
    Dinardo, Giuseppina
    Macarini, Luca
    Guglielmi, Giuseppe
    Cammarota, Aldo
    CANCER INVESTIGATION, 2015, 33 (05) : 159 - 164
  • [9] Conspicuity of breast lesions at different b values on diffusion-weighted imaging
    Chen, Xin
    He, Xi-Jing
    Jin, Rui
    Guo, You-Min
    Zhao, Xian
    Kang, Hua-Feng
    Mo, Li-Ping
    Wu, Qian
    BMC CANCER, 2012, 12
  • [10] Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of the High-Risk Breast: Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values and Their Relationship to Breast Density
    O'Flynn, Elizabeth A. M.
    Wilson, Robin M.
    Allen, Steven D.
    Locke, Imogen
    Scurr, Erica
    deSouza, Nandita M.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2014, 39 (04) : 805 - 811