Effect of different sterilization modes on the surface morphology, ion release, and bone reaction of retrieved micro-implants

被引:12
作者
El-Wassefy, Noha [1 ]
El-Fallal, Abeer [1 ]
Taha, Mahasen [1 ]
机构
[1] Mansoura Univ, Fac Dent, Mansoura 35516, Egypt
关键词
Micro-implants; Sterilizations; Surface morphology; Ion release; Bone interface histology; MINI-IMPLANT; TITANIUM; BIOACTIVITY; ANCHORAGE;
D O I
10.2319/012014-56.1
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare as-received and sterilized micro-implants in order to assess the prospects of reusing them. Materials and Methods: Forty micro-implants from a single manufacturing lot were used in the study. Thirty were retrieved from patients after successful service in their mouth and with no signs of failure. The retrieved micro-implants were divided into three groups, according to method of sterilization: autoclave, gamma radiation, or ultraviolet radiation. All groups were subjected to scanning electron microscope analysis for surface morphology assessment. The specimens were immersed in a standard simulated body-fluid solution kept at 37 degrees C in an incubator; the solution was then withdrawn at 24 hours and 30 days to evaluate aluminum and vanadium ion release by atomic absorption spectrophotometer in parts per billion. The micro-implants were then surgically implanted into the tibia of rabbits for a 1-month healing period, and the bone-implant blocks were processed for routine histologic examination. Results: This study revealed that sterilized micro-implants had altered surface topography, different ion release values, and different histologic cell reactions than the as-received micro-implants. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that retrieved self-drilling micro-implants have tip sharpness variations that require correction before insertion by bone drilling. The autoclave-sterilized micro-implants showed better histologic results than micro-implants sterilized by gamma or ultraviolet rays.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 47
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Bae Seong-Min, 2002, J Clin Orthod, V36, P298
[2]   SURFACE MODIFICATION OF TITANIUM-ALLOY IMPLANTS [J].
BROWNE, M ;
GREGSON, PJ .
BIOMATERIALS, 1994, 15 (11) :894-898
[3]   INVITRO SIMULATION OF BIOCOMPATIBILITY OF TI-AL-V [J].
BRUNEEL, N ;
HELSEN, JA .
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH, 1988, 22 (03) :203-214
[4]  
Chang RCS, 2000, INT J ORAL MAX SURG, V29, P54, DOI 10.1034/j.1399-0020.2000.290113.x
[5]   Assessment of anodized titanium implants bioactivity [J].
El-wassefy, Noha A. ;
Hammouda, Ibrahim M. ;
Habib, Ahmed Nour El-deen A. ;
El-awady, Ghada Y. ;
Marzook, Hamdy A. .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2014, 25 (02) :E1-E9
[6]   Bicortical titanium screws for critical orthodontic anchorage in the mandible: a preliminary report on clinical applications [J].
Freudenthaler, JW ;
Haas, R ;
Bantleon, HP .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2001, 12 (04) :358-363
[7]   Pharmacokinetics of vanadium in humans after intravenous administration of a vanadium containing albumin solution [J].
Heinemann, G ;
Fichtl, B ;
Vogt, W .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2003, 55 (03) :241-245
[8]   Mini-implant anchorage for maxillary canine retraction: A pilot study [J].
Herman, Robert J. ;
Currier, G. Frans ;
Miyake, Alan .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2006, 130 (02) :228-235
[9]   Composition of surface oxide film of titanium with culturing murine fibroblasts L929 [J].
Hiromoto, S ;
Hanawa, T ;
Asami, K .
BIOMATERIALS, 2004, 25 (06) :979-986
[10]  
Kanomi R, 1997, J Clin Orthod, V31, P763