Vascular endothelial injury assessed with functional techniques in systemic sclerosis patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension versus systemic sclerosis patients without pulmonary arterial hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Microvascular dysfunction is one of the hallmarks of systemic sclerosis (SSc). The presence of pulmonary-arterial-hypertension (PAH) in SSc-patients is associated with poor prognosis. This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies assessing microvascular and endothelial injury with functional techniques in SSc-patients with PAH (SSc-PAH) compared to those without PAH (SSc-non-PAH) (PROSPERO: CRD42021236212). Literature search involved PubMed, the-Cochrane-Library, Web-of-Science, Scopus and manual search of article references. Studies assessing microvascular function by all available functional methods were considered eligible. Preclinical studies and studies using structural nailfold-videocapillaroscopy or biomarkers were excluded. Newcastle-Ottawa-Scale (NOS) was applied to evaluate the quality of retrieved studies. From a total of 602 retrieved articles, four studies (n = 159 participants) were included in meta-analysis; three studies were of high quality (NOS >= 7). In pooled analysis, a marginally significant impaired microvascular function was observed in SSc-PAH compared to SSc-non-PAH patients [SMD - 0.71, 95% CI (- 1.53, 0.12)], with significant between-study heterogeneity (I-2 = 80%, p = 0.002). Among the studies examining endothelium-dependent and -independent vasodilation with LDF-iontophoresis, SSc-PAH subjects had significantly impaired endothelium-dependent-vasodilation [Ach-stimulated %change WMD - 216.79, 95% CI (- 337.87, - 95.71), I-2 = 0%, p = 0.40], but no significant differences in endothelium-independent-vasodilation [SNP-stimulated %change WMD 90.84, 95% CI (- 82.52, 264.19), I-2 = 44%, p = 0.18] compared with SSc-non-PAH subjects. In sensitivity analysis including only studies where SSc-PAH patients were diagnosed by right-heart-catheterization, a borderline difference between the two groups was noted [SMD - 1.09, 95% CI (- 2.30, 0.13), I-2 = 82%, p = 0.004]. SSc-PAH patients showed marginally impaired microvascular function in the pooled analysis, as well as impaired endothelium-dependent-vasodilation in subgroup analysis compared with SSc-non-PAH patients. Vascular endothelial dysfunction could be involved in high cardiovascular risk of patients with SSc and PAH.