Implementing context information management in forensic casework: Minimizing contextual bias in firearms examination

被引:38
作者
Mattijssen, E. J. A. T. [1 ,2 ]
Kerkhoff, W. [1 ]
Berger, C. E. H. [1 ,3 ]
Dror, I. E. [4 ,5 ]
Stoel, R. D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Netherlands Forens Inst, POB 24044, NL-2490 AA The Hague, Netherlands
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Inst Behav Sci, POB 9104, NL-6500 HE Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Leiden Univ, Inst Criminal Law & Criminol, POB 9520, NL-2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands
[4] UCL, London WC1E 6BT, England
[5] Cognit Consultants Int CCI HQ, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Context information management; Contextual bias; Task-irrelevant case information; Subjective judgment; Quality assurance; Cognitive forensics; SEQUENTIAL UNMASKING; WILL; SCIENCE; STAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.scijus.2015.11.004
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律]; R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
0301 ; 10 ;
摘要
Managing context information in forensic casework aims to minimize task-irrelevant information while maximizing the task-relevant information that reaches the examiner. A design and implementation of context information management (CIM) is described for forensic firearms examination. Guided by a taxonomy of different sources of context information, a flow-chart was constructed that specifies the process of casework examination and context information management. Due to the risk of bias, another examiner may need to be involved when context information management is unsuccessful. Application of context information management does not make a subjective examination objective, but can limit the risks of bias with a minimal investment of time and resources. (C) 2015 The Chartered Society of Forensic Sciences. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 122
页数:10
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2014, FORENSIC SCI POLICY, DOI DOI 10.1080/19409044.2014.929759
  • [2] Quantitative comparison of striated toolmarks
    Baiker, Martin
    Keereweer, Isaac
    Pieterman, Rene
    Vermeij, Erwin
    van der Weerd, Jaap
    Zoon, Peter
    [J]. FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 242 : 186 - 199
  • [3] Berger C, 2014, SCI JUSTICE, V54, P510, DOI 10.1016/j.scijus.2014.03.005
  • [4] Bettcher C.J.F., 1954, TIJDSCHRIFT STRAFREC, VLXIII, P77
  • [5] Research focused mainly on bias will paralyse forensic science
    Champod, Christophe
    [J]. SCIENCE & JUSTICE, 2014, 54 (02) : 107 - 109
  • [6] Dror I., 2015, PHILOS T R SOC, V370
  • [7] Dror I. E., 2013, Forensic Science Policy Management: An International Journal, V4, P105, DOI DOI 10.1080/19409044.2014.901437
  • [8] Contextual information renders experts vulnerable to making erroneous identifications
    Dror, IE
    Charlton, D
    Péron, AE
    [J]. FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 156 (01) : 74 - 78
  • [9] Meta-analytically quantifying the reliability and biasability of forensic experts
    Dror, Itiel
    Rosenthal, Robert
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES, 2008, 53 (04) : 900 - 903
  • [10] The ambition to be scientific: Human expert performance and objectivity
    Dror, Itiel
    [J]. SCIENCE & JUSTICE, 2013, 53 (02) : 81 - 82