Fine-grained neural decoding with distributed word representations

被引:18
作者
Wang, Shaonan [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Jiajun [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Haiyan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lin, Nan [4 ,5 ]
Zong, Chengqing [1 ,2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] CASIA, Natl Lab Pattern Recognit, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Automat, Brainnetome Ctr, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Inst Psychol, CAS Key Lab Behav Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Dept Psychol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[6] CAS Ctr Excellence Brain Sci & Intelligence Techn, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Neural decoding; fMRI word decoding; Word class; Stimuli paradigm; Word embedding models; Informative voxels; NATURAL IMAGES; BRAIN; NOUNS; VERBS; LANGUAGE; REVEALS; OBJECTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ins.2019.08.043
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
fMRI word decoding refers to decode what the human brain is thinking by interpreting functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) scans from people watching or listening to words, representing a sort of mind-reading technology. Existing works decoding words from imaging data have been largely limited to concrete nouns from a relatively small number of semantic categories. Moreover, such studies use different word-stimulus presentation paradigms and different computational models, lacking a comprehensive understanding of the influence of different factors on fMRI word decoding. In this paper, we present a large-scale evaluation of eight word embedding models and their combinations for decoding fine-grained fMRI data associated with three classes of words recorded from three stimulus-presentation paradigms. Specifically, we investigate the following research questions: (1) How does the brain-image decoder perform on different classes of words? (2) How does the brain-image decoder perform in different stimulus-presentation paradigms? (3) How well does each word embedding model allow us to decode neural activation patterns in the human brain? Furthermore, we analyze the most informative voxels associated with different classes of words, stimulus-presentation paradigms and word embedding models to explore their neural basis. The results have shown the following: (1) Different word classes can be decoded most effectively with different word embedding models. Concrete nouns and verbs are more easily distinguished than abstract nouns and verbs. (2) Among the three stimulus-presentation paradigms (picture, sentence and word clouds), the picture paradigm achieves the highest decoding accuracy, followed by the sentence paradigm. (3) Among the eight word embedding models, the model that encodes visual information obtains the best performance, followed by models that encode textual and contextual information. (4) Compared to concrete nouns, which activate mostly vision-related brain regions, abstract nouns activate broader brain regions such as the visual, language and default-mode networks. Moreover, both the picture paradigm and the model that encodes visual information have stronger associations with vision-related brain regions than other paradigms and word embedding models, respectively. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:256 / 272
页数:17
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] Abnar S., 2018, Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on Cognitive Modeling and Computational Linguistics (CMCL 2018), P57
  • [2] Decoding semantics across fMRI sessions with different stimulus modalities: a practical MVPA study
    Akama, Hiroyuki
    Murphy, Brian
    Na, Li
    Shimizu, Yumiko
    Poesio, Massimo
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN NEUROINFORMATICS, 2012, 6
  • [3] Discriminating Taxonomic Categories and Domains in Mental Simulations of Concepts of Varying Concreteness
    Anderson, Andrew J.
    Murphy, Brian
    Poesio, Massimo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 26 (03) : 658 - 681
  • [4] Predicting Neural Activity Patterns Associated with Sentences Using a Neurobiologically Motivated Model of Semantic Representation
    Anderson, Andrew James
    Binder, Jeffrey R.
    Fernandino, Leonardo
    Humphries, Colin J.
    Conant, Lisa L.
    Aguilar, Mario
    Wang, Xixi
    Doko, Donias
    Raizada, Rajeev D. S.
    [J]. CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2017, 27 (09) : 4379 - 4395
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1974, PSYCCRITIQUES
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2016, P 2016 C EMPIRICAL M, DOI DOI 10.18653/V1/D16-1213
  • [7] [Anonymous], THESIS
  • [8] [Anonymous], ARXIV190106693
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2017, T ASSOC COMPUT LING
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2015, P 2015 C N AM CHAPT, DOI DOI 10.3115/V1/N15-1165