Systemic approaches to incident analysis in aviation: Comparison of STAMP, agent-based modelling and institutions

被引：19

作者：

Mogles, Nataliya ^{[1
]}

Padget, Julian ^{[1
]}

Bosse, Tibor ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Bath, Dept Comp Sci, Bath, Avon, England

[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Comp Sci, Nijmegen, Netherlands

来源：

SAFETY SCIENCE | 2018年 / 108卷

关键词：

Aviation safety; Norms; Cognitive functioning; Socio-technical systems; Incident analysis; ACCIDENT ANALYSIS; RISK; DYNAMICS; ACCIMAP;

D O I：

10.1016/j.ssci.2018.04.009

中图分类号：

T [工业技术];

学科分类号：

08 ;

摘要：

The rapid development and increasing complexity of modern socio-technical systems suggest an urgent need for systemic safety analysis approaches because traditional linear models cannot cope with this complexity. In the aviation safety literature, among systemic accident and incident analysis methods, Systems Theoretic Accident Modelling and Processes (STAMP) and Agent-based modelling (ABM) are the most cited ones. STAMP is a qualitative analysis approach known for its thoroughness and comprehensiveness. Computational ABM approach is a formal quantitative method which proved to be suitable for modelling complex flexible systems. In addition, from a legal point of view, formal systemic institutional modelling potentially provides an interesting contribution to accident and incident analysis. The current work compares three systemic modelling approaches: STAMP, ABM and institutional modelling applied to a case study in an aviation domain.

引用

页码：59 / 71

页数：13

共 45 条

[11] An Agent-Based Approach for Accident Analysis in Safety Critical Domains: A Case Study on a Runway Incursion Incident
Bosse, Tibor
Mogles, Nataliya M.
[J]. TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTATIONAL COLLECTIVE INTELLIGENCE XVII, 2014, 8790 : 66 - 88
[12] SPECIFICATION AND VERIFICATION OF DYNAMICS IN AGENT MODELS
Bosse, Tibor
Jonker, Catholijn M.
Van der Meij, Lourens
Sharpanskykh, Alexei
Treur, Jan
[J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COOPERATIVE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2009, 18 (01) : 167 - 193
[13] Cliffe O, 2007, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT, V4371, P60
[14] A system dynamics analysis of the Westray mine disaster
Cooke, DL
[J]. SYSTEM DYNAMICS REVIEW, 2003, 19 (02) : 139 - 166
[15] De Vos Marina, 2011, New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. JSAI-isAI 2010 Workshops LENLS, JURISIN, AMBN, ISS. Revised Selected Papers, P129, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-25655-4_12
[16] Hollnagel E, 2004, P COGN SYST ENG PROC, P155
[17] Kirwan B, 1994, A Guide to Practical Human Reliability Assessment
[18] Korb Kevin B, 2010, Bayesian Artificial Intelligence. Second Edition ed: CRC Press
[19] A LOGIC-BASED CALCULUS OF EVENTS
KOWALSKI, R
SERGOT, M
[J]. NEW GENERATION COMPUTING, 1986, 4 (01) : 67 - 95
[20] Disasters and organisations: From lessons learnt to theorising
Le Coze, Jean-christophe
[J]. SAFETY SCIENCE, 2008, 46 (01) : 132 - 149

← 1 2 3 4 5 →