Systemic approaches to incident analysis in aviation: Comparison of STAMP, agent-based modelling and institutions

被引：19
作者：
Mogles, Nataliya [1 ]
Padget, Julian [1 ]
Bosse, Tibor [2 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Bath, Dept Comp Sci, Bath, Avon, England
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Comp Sci, Nijmegen, Netherlands
来源：
SAFETY SCIENCE | 2018年 / 108卷
关键词：
Aviation safety; Norms; Cognitive functioning; Socio-technical systems; Incident analysis; ACCIDENT ANALYSIS; RISK; DYNAMICS; ACCIMAP;
D O I：
10.1016/j.ssci.2018.04.009
中图分类号：
T [工业技术];
学科分类号：
08 ;
摘要：
The rapid development and increasing complexity of modern socio-technical systems suggest an urgent need for systemic safety analysis approaches because traditional linear models cannot cope with this complexity. In the aviation safety literature, among systemic accident and incident analysis methods, Systems Theoretic Accident Modelling and Processes (STAMP) and Agent-based modelling (ABM) are the most cited ones. STAMP is a qualitative analysis approach known for its thoroughness and comprehensiveness. Computational ABM approach is a formal quantitative method which proved to be suitable for modelling complex flexible systems. In addition, from a legal point of view, formal systemic institutional modelling potentially provides an interesting contribution to accident and incident analysis. The current work compares three systemic modelling approaches: STAMP, ABM and institutional modelling applied to a case study in an aviation domain.
引用
收藏
页码：59 / 71
页数：13
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] STAMP - Holistic system safety approach or just another risk model?
    Altabbakh, Hanan
    AlKazimi, Mohammad A.
    Murray, Susan
    Grantham, Katie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2014, 32 : 109 - 119
  • [2] Predictive safety analytics: inferring aviation accident shaping factors and causation
    Ancel, Ersin
    Shih, Ann T.
    Jones, Sharon M.
    Reveley, Mary S.
    Luxhoj, James T.
    Evans, Joni K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH, 2015, 18 (04) : 428 - 451
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2001, PROGR ASTRONAUTICS A
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1995, FDN ORG SCI
  • [5] Australian Transport Safety Bureau, 2008, Aviation Research and Analysis Report AR-2007-053
  • [6] A model of legal reasoning with cases incorporating theories and values
    Bench-Capon, T
    Sartor, G
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2003, 150 (1-2) : 97 - 143
  • [7] RATING ACCIDENT MODELS AND INVESTIGATION METHODOLOGIES
    BENNER, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SAFETY RESEARCH, 1985, 16 (03) : 105 - 126
  • [8] Bosse T., 2013, P 5 INT C AG ART INT
  • [9] Bosse T., 2013, P 4 INT AIR TRANSP O
  • [10] A language and environment for analysis of dynamics by simulation
    Bosse, Tibor
    Jonker, Catholijn M.
    Van der Meij, Lourens
    Treur, Jan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TOOLS, 2007, 16 (03) : 435 - 464
12345