Political orientation and adherence to social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy

被引:28
作者
Barbieri, Paolo Nicola [1 ]
Bonini, Beatrice [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gothenburg, Prometeia & Ctr Hlth Econ, Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Columbia Univ, New York, NY USA
关键词
COVID-19; Coronavirus; Political belief; Protest vote; Geolocation data; PERSONALITY-TRAITS; RISK COMMUNICATION; INFLUENZA; NETHERLANDS; ATTITUDES; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1007/s40888-021-00224-w
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Many governments have implemented social distancing and lockdown measures to curb the spread of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19). Using province-level geolocation data from Italy, we document that political disbelief can limit government policy effectiveness. Residents in provinces leaning towards extreme right-wing parties show lower rates of compliance with social distancing order. We also find that, during the Italian lockdown, provinces with high protest votes virtually disregarded all social distancing orders. On the contrary, in provinces with higher political support for the current political legislation, we found a higher degree of social distancing compliance. These results are robust to controlling for other factors, including time, geography, local COVID-19 cases and deaths, healthcare hospital beds, and other sociodemographic and economic characteristics. Our research shows that bipartisan support and national responsibility are essential to implement and manage social distancing efficiently. From a broader perspective, our findings suggest that partisan politics and discontent with the political class (i.e., protest voting) might significantly affect human health and the economy.
引用
收藏
页码:483 / 504
页数:22
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]   Multi-objective two-echelon location-distribution of non-medical products [J].
Abbassi, Abderrahman ;
Kharraja, Said ;
Alaoui, Ahmed El Hilali ;
Boukachour, Jaouad ;
Paras, Denis .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2021, 59 (17) :5284-5300
[2]   The Immediate Effect of COVID-19 Policies on Social-Distancing Behavior in the United States [J].
Abouk, Rahi ;
Heydari, Babak .
PUBLIC HEALTH REPORTS, 2021, 136 (02) :245-252
[3]  
Achen ChristopherH., 2016, Democracy for Realists. Edited by Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government, DOI DOI 10.1515/9781400882731
[4]   Pandemic Politics: Timing State-Level Social Distancing Responses to COVID-19 [J].
Adolph, Christopher ;
Amano, Kenya ;
Bang-Jensen, Bree ;
Fullman, Nancy ;
Wilkerson, John .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLITICS POLICY AND LAW, 2021, 46 (02) :211-233
[5]   Polarization and public health: Partisan differences in social distancing during the coronavirus pandemic [J].
Allcott, Hunt ;
Boxell, Levi ;
Conway, Jacob ;
Gentzkow, Matthew ;
Thaler, Michael ;
Yang, David .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2020, 191
[6]   Nudges at the dentist [J].
Altmann, Steffen ;
Traxler, Christian .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2014, 72 :19-38
[7]   Covid-19 exposes weaknesses in European response to outbreaks [J].
Anderson, Michael ;
Mckee, Martin ;
Mossialos, Elias .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 368
[8]   An examination of the effects of delayed versus immediate prompts on safety belt use [J].
Austin, J ;
Sigurdsson, SO ;
Rubin, YS .
ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR, 2006, 38 (01) :140-149
[9]   The COVID-19 pandemic and the 2020 US presidential election [J].
Baccini, Leonardo ;
Brodeur, Abel ;
Weymouth, Stephen .
JOURNAL OF POPULATION ECONOMICS, 2021, 34 (02) :739-767
[10]   The psychological roots of populist voting: Evidence from the United States, the Netherlands and Germany [J].
Bakker, Bert N. ;
Rooduijn, Matthijs ;
Schumacher, Gijs .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL RESEARCH, 2016, 55 (02) :302-320