Landslide vulnerability assessment based on entropy method: a case study from Kegalle district, Sri Lanka

被引:40
作者
Perera, E. N. C. [1 ,2 ]
Jayawardana, D. T. [3 ]
Jayasinghe, P. [4 ]
Ranagalage, Manjula [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colombo, IHRA, Colombo, Sri Lanka
[2] Univ Sri Jayewardenepura, Fac Grad Studies, Nugegoda, Sri Lanka
[3] Univ Sri Jayewardenepura, Dept Forestry & Environm Sci, Fac Sci Appl, Nugegoda, Sri Lanka
[4] Natl Bldg Res Org, Landslide Div, Colombo, Sri Lanka
[5] Univ Tsukuba, Fac Life & Environm Sci, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058572, Japan
[6] Rajarata Univ Sri Lanka, Dept Environm Management, Fac Social Sci & Humanities, Mihintale 50300, Sri Lanka
关键词
Landslides; Entropy method; Interpolation; Vulnerability; DISASTER RISK REDUCTION; QUANTITATIVE ESTIMATION; HAZARD; SUSCEPTIBILITY; COMMUNITIES; RESILIENCE; FRAMEWORK; GIS;
D O I
10.1007/s40808-019-00615-w
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The concept of landslide vulnerability to a given location is hard to quantify. Few studies have been carried to determine susceptibility using social and physical factors. This study is the first attempt in Sri Lanka to quantify level of vulnerability by integrating major physical and social indicators to map the spatial distribution of vulnerability. Considering the limitations of traditional weight evaluation method in calculation of the multiple indicators and ignorance of the associations among evaluating indicators, a new weight evaluation process, entropy method was introduced in this study. This improved method for determination of weight of the evaluating indicators was applied to estimate weight for the 14 selected indicators. The primary data were obtained from a comprehensive questioner survey (n = 402) of households or buildings (elements) with their coordinates based on a spatially balanced approach for ensuring spatial coverage of the entire landslide distribution. The spatial distribution of vulnerability was mapped using Kriging interpolation. According to the map, landslide vulnerabilities in the study area demonstrate notable regional specifications. Besides, the spatial distribution of vulnerability has shown a close relationship with rural and urban settlements. Results of spatial vulnerability reflect discrimination and inequalities in the development of the study area. According to landslide vulnerability analyses, 14.6% (247 km(2)) of the entire area is found to be the highest vulnerable zone for a landslide and 39.8% (675 km(2)) of area categorized under the lowest zone to vulnerability. Further, the study revealed a reasonable contribution by entropy method on analysis of social and physical indicators, which is useful for other vulnerability assessments.
引用
收藏
页码:1635 / 1649
页数:15
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]  
AGUILAR BH, 2016, INVESTIGATIONSGEOGRA, V90, P7, DOI DOI 10.14350/RIG.50663
[2]   Disaster risk reduction education in Indonesia: challenges and recommendations for scaling up [J].
Amri, Avianto ;
Bird, Deanne K. ;
Ronan, Kevin ;
Haynes, Katharine ;
Towers, Briony .
NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2017, 17 (04) :595-612
[3]   Reducing landslide risk in communities: Evidence from the Eastern Caribbean [J].
Anderson, Malcolm G. ;
Holcombe, Elizabeth ;
Blake, James R. ;
Ghesquire, Francis ;
Holm-Nielsen, Niels ;
Fisseha, Tiguist .
APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2011, 31 (02) :590-599
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2011, EM DAT OFDA CRED INT
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2017, EC SOC STAT SRI LANK, P14
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2018, GEOINFOR GEOSTAT OVE, DOI DOI 10.4172/2327-4581.S3-004
[7]  
[Anonymous], SUSTAINABILITY BASEL
[8]  
[Anonymous], SUSTAINABILITY BASEL
[9]  
Arnold M, 2006, WORLD BANK DISASTER, V6, P147
[10]  
Biemer PP, 2003, INTRO SURVEY QUALITY, P147