Robust Scheduling of Smart Appliances in Active Apartments With User Behavior Uncertainty

被引:44
作者
Paridari, Kaveh [1 ,2 ]
Parisio, Alessandra [3 ]
Sandberg, Henrik [1 ,2 ]
Johansson, Karl Henrik [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] KTH Royal Inst Technol, ACCESS Linnaeus Ctr, S-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Sch Elect Engn, Dept Automat Control, S-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Univ Manchester, Sch Elect & Elect Engn, Elect Energy & Power Syst Grp, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
关键词
Demand response; mixed-integer linear programming; multi-objective robust optimization; robust scheduling of smart appliances; user behavior uncertainty; DEMAND RESPONSE; OPTIMIZATION; MANAGEMENT; PRICE; CONSUMPTION;
D O I
10.1109/TASE.2015.2497300
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In this paper, we propose a robust approach for scheduling of smart appliances and electrical energy storages (EESs) in active apartments with the aim of reducing both the electricity bill and the CO2 emissions. The proposed robust formulation takes the user behavior uncertainty into account so that the optimal appliances schedule is less sensitive to unpredictable changes in user preferences. The user behavior uncertainty is modeled as uncertainty in the cost function coefficients. In order to reduce the level of conservativeness of the robust solution, we introduce a parameter allowing to achieve a trade-off between the price of robustness and the protection against uncertainty. Mathematically, the robust scheduling problem is posed as a multi-objective Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP), which is solved by using standard algorithms. The numerical results show effectiveness of the proposed approach to increase both the electricity bill and CO2 emissions savings, in the presence of user behavior uncertainties. Mathematical insights into the robust formulation are illustrated and the sensitivity of the optimum cost in the presence of uncertainties is investigated. Although home appliances and EESs are considered in this work, we point out that the proposed scheduling framework is generally applicable to many use cases, e.g., charging and discharging of electrical vehicles in an effective way. In addition, it is applicable to various scenarios considering different uncertainty sources, different storage technologies and generic programmable electrical loads, as well as different optimization criteria.
引用
收藏
页码:247 / 259
页数:13
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Introducing a demand-based electricity distribution tariff in the residential sector: Demand response and customer perception
    Bartusch, Cajsa
    Wallin, Fredrik
    Odlare, Monica
    Vassileva, Iana
    Wester, Lars
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (09) : 5008 - 5025
  • [2] Robust scheduling of smart appliances with uncertain electricity prices in a heterogeneous population
    Bassamzadeh, Nastaran
    Ghanem, Roger
    Lu, Shuai
    Kazemitabar, Seyed Jalal
    [J]. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2014, 84 : 537 - 547
  • [3] The price of robustness
    Bertsimas, D
    Sim, M
    [J]. OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2004, 52 (01) : 35 - 53
  • [4] Robust discrete optimization and network flows
    Bertsimas, D
    Sim, M
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING, 2003, 98 (1-3) : 49 - 71
  • [5] Boyd S, 2004, CONVEX OPTIMIZATION
  • [6] Uncertainty-Aware Household Appliance Scheduling Considering Dynamic Electricity Pricing in Smart Home
    Chen, Xiaodao
    Wei, Tongquan
    Hu, Shiyan
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID, 2013, 4 (02) : 932 - 941
  • [7] Real-Time Price-Based Demand Response Management for Residential Appliances via Stochastic Optimization and Robust Optimization
    Chen, Zhi
    Wu, Lei
    Fu, Yong
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID, 2012, 3 (04) : 1822 - 1831
  • [8] Fischetti M, 2009, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V5868, P61, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-05465-5_3
  • [9] Gentle J. E., 2003, RANDOM NUMBER GENERA
  • [10] Demand side management-A simulation of household behavior under variable prices
    Gottwalt, Sebastian
    Ketter, Wolfgang
    Block, Carsten
    Collins, John
    Weinhardt, Christof
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (12) : 8163 - 8174