Non-mydriatic fundus photography as an alternative to indirect ophthalmoscopy for screening of diabetic retinopathy in community settings: a comparative pilot study in rural and tribal India

被引:8
作者
Gajiwala, Uday R. [1 ]
Pachchigar, Swapnil [2 ]
Patel, Dhaval [2 ]
Mistry, Ishwar [3 ]
Oza, Yash [3 ]
Kundaria, Dhaval [3 ]
Shamanna, B. R. [4 ]
机构
[1] Divyajyoti Trust, Surat, Gujarat, India
[2] Divyajyoti Trust, Retina Dept, Surat, Gujarat, India
[3] Divyajyoti Trust, Gen Ophthalmol Dept, Surat, Gujarat, India
[4] Univ Hyderabad, Sch Med Sci, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
关键词
diabetic retinopathy; medical retina; public health; OPHTHALMOLOGICAL SOCIETY; AGREEMENT; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058485
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives The impending and increasing prevalence of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in India has necessitated a need for affordable and valid community outreach screening programme for DR, especially in rural and far to reach indigenous local communities. The present study is a pilot study aimed to compare non-mydriatic fundus photography with indirect ophthalmoscopy for its utilisation as a feasible and logistically convenient screening modality for DR in an older age, rural, tribal population in Western India. Design and setting This community-based, cross-sectional, prospective population study was a part of a module using Rapid Assessment of Avoidable Blindness and DR methodology in 8340 sampled participants with >= 50 years age. In this study, the diabetics identified were screened for DR using two methods: non-mydriatic fundus photography on the field by trained professionals, that were then graded by a retina specialist at the base hospital and indirect ophthalmoscopy by expert ophthalmologists in the field with masking of each other's findings for its utility and comparison. Results The prevalence of DR, sight threatening DR and maculopathy using indirect ophthalmoscopy was found to be 12.1%, 2.1% and 6.6%, respectively. A fair agreement (kappa=0.48 for DR and 0.59 for maculopathy) was observed between both the detection methods. The sensitivity and specificity of fundus photographic evaluation compared with indirect ophthalmoscopy were found to be 54.8% and 92.1% (for DR), 60.7% and 90.8% (for any DR) and 84.2% and 94.8% (for only maculopathy), respectively. Conclusion Non-mydriatic fundus photography has the potential to identify DR (any retinopathy or maculopathy) in community settings in Indian population. Its utility as an affordable and logistically convenient cum practical modality is demonstrable. The sensitivity of this screening modality can be further increased by investing in better resolution cameras, capturing quality images and training and validation of imagers.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2019, WHO REPORT VISION
[2]   Sensitivity and specificity of automated analysis of single-field non-mydriatic fundus photographs by Bosch DR Algorithm-Comparison with mydriatic fundus photography (ETDRS) for screening in undiagnosed diabetic retinopathy [J].
Bawankar, Pritam ;
Shanbhag, Nita ;
Smitha, S. K. ;
Dhawan, Bodhraj ;
Palsule, Aratee ;
Kumar, Devesh ;
Chandel, Shailja ;
Sood, Suneet .
PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (12)
[3]   Comparison of image-assisted versus traditional fundus examination [J].
Brown, Kristen ;
Sewell, Jeanette M. ;
Trempe, Clement ;
Peto, Tunde ;
Travison, Thomas G. .
EYE AND BRAIN, 2013, 5 :1-8
[4]   The Lancet Global Health Commission on Global Eye Health: vision beyond 2020 [J].
Burton, Matthew J. ;
Ramke, Jacqueline ;
Marques, Ana Patricia ;
Bourne, Rupert R. A. ;
Congdon, Nathan ;
Jones, Iain ;
Tong, Brandon A. M. Ah ;
Arunga, Simon ;
Bachani, Damodar ;
Bascaran, Covadonga ;
Bastawrous, Andrew ;
Blanchet, Karl ;
Braithwaite, Tasanee ;
Buchan, John C. ;
Cairns, John ;
Cama, Anasaini ;
Chagunda, Margarida ;
Chuluunkhuu, Chimgee ;
Cooper, Andrew ;
Crofts-Lawrence, Jessica ;
Dean, William H. ;
Denniston, Alastair K. ;
Ehrlich, Joshua R. ;
Emerson, Paul M. ;
Evans, Jennifer R. ;
Frick, Kevin D. ;
Friedman, David S. ;
Furtado, Joao M. ;
Gichangi, Michael M. ;
Gichuhi, Stephen ;
Gilbert, Suzanne S. ;
Gurung, Reeta ;
Habtamu, Esmael ;
Holland, Peter ;
Jonas, Jost B. ;
Keane, Pearse A. ;
Keay, Lisa ;
Khanna, Rohit C. ;
Khaw, Peng Tee ;
Kuper, Hannah ;
Kyari, Fatima ;
Lansingh, Van C. ;
Mactaggart, Islay ;
Mafwiri, Milka M. ;
Mathenge, Wanjiku ;
McCormick, Ian ;
Morjaria, Priya ;
Mowatt, Lizette ;
Muirhead, Debbie ;
Murthy, Gudlavalleti V. S. .
LANCET GLOBAL HEALTH, 2021, 9 (04) :E489-E551
[5]  
Census, 2011, TAP DISTR POP 2011 2
[6]   Non-Mydriatic Fundus Retinography in Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy: Agreement Between Family Physicians, General Ophthalmologists, and a Retinal Specialist [J].
Cunha, Leonardo Provetti ;
Figueiredo, Evelyn Alvernaz ;
Araujo, Henrique Pereira ;
Ferreira Costa-Cunha, Luciana Virginia ;
Costa, Carolina Ferreira ;
Costa Neto, Jose de Melo ;
Freitas Matos, Aline Mota ;
de Oliveira, Marise Machado ;
Bastos, Marcus Gomes ;
Ribeiro Monteiro, Mario Luiz .
FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2018, 9
[7]   Predictors of Photographic Quality with a Handheld Nonmydriatic Fundus Camera Used for Screening of Vision-Threatening Diabetic Retinopathy [J].
Davila, Jose R. ;
Sengupta, Sabyasachi S. ;
Niziol, Leslie M. ;
Sindal, Manavi D. ;
Besirli, Cagri G. ;
Upadhyaya, Swati ;
Woodward, Maria A. ;
Venkatesh, Rengaraj ;
Robin, Alan L. ;
Grubbs, Joseph, Jr. ;
Newman-Casey, Paula Anne .
OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2017, 238 (1-2) :89-99
[8]  
DGHS Directorate General of Health Services Government of India, 2017, NAT PROGR CONTR BLIN
[9]   Advances in Retinal Imaging and Applications in Diabetic Retinopathy Screening: A Review [J].
Fenner, Beau J. ;
Wong, Raymond L. M. ;
Lam, Wai-Ching ;
Tan, Gavin S. W. ;
Cheung, Gemmy C. M. .
OPHTHALMOLOGY AND THERAPY, 2018, 7 (02) :333-346
[10]   Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in India: The All India Ophthalmological Society Diabetic Retinopathy Eye Screening Study 2014 [J].
Gadkari, Salil S. ;
Maskati, Quresh B. ;
Nayak, Barun Kumar .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 64 (01) :38-44