WRDet: A Breast Cancer Detector for Full-Field Digital Mammograms

被引:1
|
作者
Yen Nhi Truong Vu [1 ]
Mombourquette, Brent [1 ]
Matthews, Thomas Paul [1 ]
Su, Jason [1 ]
Singh, Sadanand [1 ]
机构
[1] Whiterabbit AI Inc, Santa Clara, CA 95054 USA
来源
MEDICAL IMAGING 2022: COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS | 2022年 / 12033卷
关键词
COMPUTER-AIDED DETECTION; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1117/12.2611932
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Regular breast screening with mammography allows for early detection of cancer and reduces breast cancer mortality. However, significant false positive and false negative rates leave opportunities for improving diagnostic accuracy. Computer-aided detection (CAD) softwares have been available to radiologists for decades to address these issues. However, traditional CAD products have failed to improve interpretation of full-field digital mammography (FFDM) images in clinical practice due to low sensitivity and a large number of false positives per image. Usage of deep learning models have shown promise in improving performance of radiologists. Unfortunately, they still have a large amount of false positives per images at reasonable sensitivities. In this work, we propose a simple and intuitive two-stage detection framework, named WRDet. WRDet consists of two stages: a region proposal network that has been optimized to enhance sensitivity and a second-stage patch classifier that boosts specificity. We highlight different rules for matching predicted proposals and ground truth boxes that are commonly used in the mammography CAD literature and compare these rules in light of the high variability in quality of ground truth annotations of mammography datasets. We additionally propose a new criterion to match predicted proposals with loose bounding box annotations that is useful for two-stage CAD systems like WRDet. Using the common CAD matching criterion that considers a prediction true positive if its center falls within the ground truth annotation, our system achieves an overall sensitivity of 81.3% and 89.4% at 0.25 and 1 false positive mark per image, respectively. For the task of mass detection, we achieve a sensitivity of 85.3% and 92% at 0.25 and 1 false positive mark per image, respectively. We also compare our results with select models reported in literature using different matching criteria. Our results demonstrate the possibility of a CAD system that could be beneficial in improving accuracy of screening mammography worldwide.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] YOLO Based Breast Masses Detection and Classification in Full-Field Digital Mammograms
    Aly, Ghada Hamed
    Marey, Mohammed
    El-Sayed, Safaa Amin
    Tolba, Mohamed Fahmy
    COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 2021, 200 (200)
  • [2] Hough Transform for Clustered Microcalcifications Detection in Full-Field Digital Mammograms
    Fanizzi, A.
    Basile, T. M. A.
    Losurdo, L.
    Amoroso, N.
    Bellotti, R.
    Bottigli, U.
    Dentamaro, R.
    Didonna, V.
    Fausto, A.
    Massafra, R.
    Moschetta, M.
    Tamborra, P.
    Tangaro, S.
    La Forgia, D.
    APPLICATIONS OF DIGITAL IMAGE PROCESSING XL, 2017, 10396
  • [3] Automated detection of breast vascular calcification on full-field digital mammograms - art. no. 691517
    Ge, Jun
    Chan, Heang-Ping
    Sahiner, Berkman
    Zhou, Chuan
    Helvie, Mark A.
    Wei, Jun
    Hadjiiski, Lubomir M.
    Zhang, Yiheng
    Wu, Yi-Ta
    Shi, Jiazheng
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2008: COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS, PTS 1 AND 2, 2008, 6915 : 91517 - 91517
  • [4] Automatic Dual-View Mass Detection in Full-Field Digital Mammograms
    Amit, Guy
    Hashoul, Sharbell
    Kisilev, Pavel
    Ophir, Boaz
    Walach, Eugene
    Zlotnick, Aviad
    MEDICAL IMAGE COMPUTING AND COMPUTER-ASSISTED INTERVENTION - MICCAI 2015, PT II, 2015, 9350 : 44 - 52
  • [5] Automated Breast Cancer Detection and Classification in Full Field Digital Mammograms Using Two Full and Cropped Detection Paths Approach
    Hamed, Ghada
    Marey, Mohammed
    Amin, Safaa Elsayed
    Tolba, Mohamed F.
    IEEE ACCESS, 2021, 9 : 116898 - 116913
  • [6] Computer-aided detection systems for breast masses: Comparison of performances on full-field digital mammograms and digitized screen-film mammograms
    Wei, Jun
    Hadjiiski, Lubomir M.
    Sahiner, Berkman
    Chan, Heang-Ping
    Ge, Jun
    Roubidoux, Marilyn A.
    Helvie, Mark A.
    Zhou, Chuan
    Wu, Yi-Ta
    Paramagul, Chintana
    Zhang, Yiheng
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2007, 14 (06) : 659 - 669
  • [7] Detection of Breast Cancer with Full-Field Digital Mammography and Computer-Aided Detection
    The, Juliette S.
    Schilling, Kathy J.
    Hoffmeister, Jeffrey W.
    Friedmann, Euvondia
    McGinnis, Ryan
    Holcomb, Richard G.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2009, 192 (02) : 337 - 340
  • [8] Regularized discriminant analysis for breast mass detection on full field digital mammograms
    Wei, Jun
    Sahiner, Berkman
    Zhang, Yiheng
    Chan, Heang-Ping
    Hadjiiski, Lubomir M.
    Zhou, Chuan
    Ge, Jun
    Wu, Yi-Ta
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2006: IMAGE PROCESSING, PTS 1-3, 2006, 6144
  • [9] Quantitative comparison of clustered microcalcifications in for-presentation and for-processing mammograms in full-field digital mammography
    Wang, Juan
    Nishikawa, Robert M.
    Yang, Yongyi
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (07) : 3726 - 3738
  • [10] Microcalcification detection in full-field digital mammograms with PFCM clustering and weighted SVM-based method
    Liu, Xiaoming
    Mei, Ming
    Liu, Jun
    Hu, Wei
    EURASIP JOURNAL ON ADVANCES IN SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2015, : 1 - 13