Affirmative action - Psychological data and the policy debates

被引:149
作者
Crosby, FJ
Iyer, A
Clayton, S
Downing, DA
机构
[1] Univ Calif Santa Cruz, Dept Psychol, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA
[2] Coll Wooster, Dept Psychol, Wooster, OH 44691 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1037/0003-066X.58.2.93
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The authors bring psychological research to bear on an examination of the policy of affirmative action. They argue that data from many studies reveal that affirmative action as a policy has more benefits than costs. Although the majority of pro-affirmative action arguments in the social sciences stress diversity, the authors' argument focuses on issues of merit. The merit-based argument, grounded in empirical studies, concludes that the policy of affirmative action conforms to the American ideal of fairness and is a necessary policy.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 115
页数:23
相关论文
共 275 条
  • [1] Practical and ethical issues pertaining to test revisions
    Adams, KM
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2000, 12 (03) : 281 - 286
  • [2] *AM PSYCH ASS, 1996, AFF ACT WHO BEN
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2002, DIVERSITY FACTOR
  • [4] [Anonymous], HUM PERFORM
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2000, BUSINESS SOC, DOI DOI 10.1177/000765030003900305
  • [6] [Anonymous], 1993, EEO LAW PERSONNEL PR
  • [7] [Anonymous], HDB MULTICULTURAL CO
  • [8] [Anonymous], CULTURE PSYCHOL READ
  • [9] [Anonymous], 1995, SOC JUSTICE RES, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF02334826
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2000, PROJ RES POP RAC HIS