Radiation dose reduction in invasive cardiology by restriction to adequate instead of optimized picture quality

被引:29
作者
Kuon, E
Dorn, C
Schmitt, M
Dahm, JB
机构
[1] Klin Fraenkische Schweiz, D-91320 Ebermannstadt, Germany
[2] Univ Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
来源
HEALTH PHYSICS | 2003年 / 84卷 / 05期
关键词
exposure; radiation; medical radiation; dose assessment; imaging;
D O I
10.1097/00004032-200305000-00008
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In this study, the cinegraphic image intensifier entrance dose level for coronary angiography was changed in four steps from dose level A (0.041 muGy frame(-1)), allowing high contrast, but coarse mottled background, to level D (0.164 muGy frame(-1)), affording high transparency and sharpness. Using this new approach throughout the course of 404 consecutive cardiac catheterizations, we reduced patient radiation exposures down to 11 to 16% of currently typical values: i.e.' mean dose area products of 5.97 Gy cm(2) (n = 91), 6.73 (n = 113), 8.11 (n = 91), and 8.90 (n = 109); cinegraphic dose area products of 2.34, 3.64, 4.56, and 5.49; and cinegraphic dose area products frame(-1) of 13.3, 19.8, 27.0, and 30.2 mGy cm(2), for levels A, B, C, and D, respectively. The number of cinegraphic frames ranged within 168 to 182 per case. Our results show that during catheterization interventionalists should vary image intensifier entrance dose levels in accordance with documented structure, angulation, and body mass index. With the exception of cases with special requirements, lower dose levels typically guarantee an adequate image quality.
引用
收藏
页码:626 / 631
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Bakalyar DM, 1997, CATHETER CARDIO DIAG, V42, P121, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0304(199710)42:2<121::AID-CCD4>3.3.CO
[2]  
2-Y
[3]   Patient radiation doses during cardiac catheterization procedures [J].
Betsou, S ;
Efstathopoulos, EP ;
Katritsis, D ;
Faulkner, K ;
Panayiotakis, G .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1998, 71 (846) :634-639
[4]   The impact of cardiology on the collective effective dose in the North of England [J].
Broadhead, DA ;
Chapple, CL ;
Faulkner, K ;
Davies, ML ;
McCallum, H .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1997, 70 (833) :492-497
[5]   Factors affecting patient radiation exposure during routine coronary angiography in a tertiary referral centre [J].
Clark, AL ;
Brennan, AG ;
Robertson, LJ ;
McArthur, JD .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2000, 73 (866) :184-189
[6]   Real-time measurement of radiation exposure to patients during diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous interventional procedures [J].
Cusma, JT ;
Bell, MR ;
Wondrow, MA ;
Taubel, JP ;
Holmes, DR .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1999, 33 (02) :427-435
[7]   Patient radiation exposure during coronary angiography and intervention [J].
Fransson, SG ;
Persliden, J .
ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2000, 41 (02) :142-144
[8]  
Hart D, 1994, 262 NRPB, P1
[9]  
HUYSKENS CJ, 1995, RADIAT PROT DOSIM, V57, P475
[10]  
Hwang E, 1998, CATHETER CARDIO DIAG, V43, P367, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0304(199804)43:4<367::AID-CCD1>3.0.CO