Comparison of Different Strategies for Heliostats Aiming Point in Cavity and External Tower Receivers

被引:23
作者
Binotti, Marco [1 ]
De Giorgi, Paolo [1 ,2 ]
Sanchez, David [2 ]
Manzolini, Giampaolo [1 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Milan, Dipartimento Energia, Grp Energy Convers Syst GECOS, Via Lambruschini 4, I-20156 Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Seville, Thermal Power Grp GMTS, Camino Descubrimientos S-N, Seville 41092, Spain
来源
JOURNAL OF SOLAR ENERGY ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME | 2016年 / 138卷 / 02期
关键词
heliostat aiming point; spillage losses; yearly optical efficiency; solar tower plants; SOLAR; DESIGN; FLUX;
D O I
10.1115/1.4032450
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
This paper investigates different strategies for the reduction of peak heat on the receiver of a solar tower plant through the variation of the heliostats aiming points. The analysis is performed for two different solar tower receivers and heliostat,field layouts. The innovative aspect of the work is in the methodology proposed: the effect of different aiming points is evaluated at different sun positions, and the yearly optical efficiency is calculated to determine drawbacks in terms of energy production. The optical simulation of the solar plant is performed without sot, through a MATLAB suite to easily manage the and output. Preliminary assessments showed that the most important displacement vertical one, and the variation of the aiming point is important for the rows that are closer to the tower. With the appropriate strategy, the peak heat flux can be reduced by about 40% with limited spillage increase compared to the reference case. This result is similar for the two investigated plants, and it is confirmed also at different sun positions. The yearly optical efficiency with the optimal aiming strategy is reduced by less than 0.5% points. Future analysis will assess potential cost reductions and thermal efficiency-increase brought about by the proposed strategies.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Alliance CSP, 2012, EC REL BEN CSP THERM
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, SOLTRACE OPT MOD SOF
[3]  
[Anonymous], REN 2013 GLOB STAT R
[4]   Optimization of Heliostat Aim Point Selection for Central Receiver Systems Based on the Ant Colony Optimization Metaheuristic [J].
Belhomme, Boris ;
Pitz-Paal, Robert ;
Schwarzboezl, Peter .
JOURNAL OF SOLAR ENERGY ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2014, 136 (01)
[5]   Optimal heliostat aiming strategy for uniform distribution of heat flux on the receiver of a solar power tower plant [J].
Besarati, Saeb M. ;
Goswami, D. Yogi ;
Stefanakos, Elias K. .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 84 :234-243
[6]   High temperature solar thermal central-receiver billboard design [J].
Boerema, Nicholas ;
Morrison, Graham ;
Taylor, Robert ;
Rosengarten, Gary .
SOLAR ENERGY, 2013, 97 :356-368
[7]   Comparison and Optimization of Heliostat Canting Methods [J].
Buck, R. ;
Teufel, E. .
JOURNAL OF SOLAR ENERGY ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2009, 131 (01) :0110011-0110018
[8]   A review of optimized design layouts for solar power tower plants with campo code [J].
Collado, Francisco J. ;
Guallar, Jesus .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2013, 20 :142-154
[9]   Preliminary design of surrounding heliostat fields [J].
Collado, Francisco J. .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2009, 34 (05) :1359-1363
[10]  
Colzi F., 2010, ES201090399 ASME