Nomogram Predicts Risk and Prognostic Factors for Bone Metastasis of Pancreatic Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis

被引:74
作者
Zhang, Wei [1 ,2 ]
Ji, Lichen [2 ,3 ]
Wang, Xijun [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Zhu, Senbo [2 ,3 ]
Luo, Junchao [2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Yin [2 ,7 ]
Tong, Yu [2 ,3 ]
Feng, Fabo [2 ,8 ]
Kang, Yao [2 ,8 ]
Bi, Qing [2 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Qingdao Univ, Zhejiang Prov Peoples Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Qingdao, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Prov Peoples Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Wenzhou Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Orthoped, Wenzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Dept Head & Neck Surg, Canc Ctr, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[5] Sun Yat Sen Univ, State Key Lab Oncol South China, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[6] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Canc Med, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[7] Bengbu Med Coll, Grad Dept, Bengbu, Peoples R China
[8] Hangzhou Med Coll Peoples Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY | 2022年 / 12卷
关键词
pancreatic cancer; bone metastasis; predictors; Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database; logistic regression; Cox regression; nomogram; BREAST-CANCER; MULTIMODAL TREATMENT; DISTANT METASTASIS; SURVIVAL; DIAGNOSIS; CARCINOMA; PATTERN; MODELS; STAGE; TOOL;
D O I
10.3389/fendo.2021.752176
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe overall survival (OS) of pancreatic cancer (PC) patients with bone metastasis (BM) is extremely low, and it is pretty hard to treat bone metastasis. However, there are currently no effective nomograms to predict the diagnosis and prognosis of pancreatic cancer with bone metastasis (PCBM). Therefore, it is of great significance to establish effective predictive models to guide clinical practice. MethodsWe screened patients from Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database between 2010 and 2016. The independent risk factors of PCBM were identified from univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses, and univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to determine independent prognostic factors affecting the prognosis of PCBM. In addition, two nomograms were constructed to predict the risk and prognosis of PCBM. We used the area under the curve (AUC), C-index and calibration curve to determine the predictive accuracy and discriminability of nomograms. The decision curve analysis (DCA) and Kaplan-Meier(K-M) survival curves were employed to further confirm the clinical effectiveness of the nomogram. ResultsMultivariable logistic regression analyses revealed that risk factors of PCBM included age, primary site, histological subtype, N stage, radiotherapy, surgery, brain metastasis, lung metastasis, and liver metastasis. Using Cox regression analyses, we found that independent prognostic factors of PCBM were age, race, grade, histological subtype, surgery, chemotherapy, and lung metastasis. We utilized nomograms to visually express data analysis results. The C-index of training cohort was 0.795 (95%CI: 0.758-0.832), whereas that of internal validation cohort was 0.800 (95%CI: 0.739-0.862), and the external validation cohort was 0.787 (95%CI: 0.746-0.828). Based on AUC of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA), we concluded that the risk and prognosis model of PCBM exhibits excellent performance. ConclusionNomogram is sufficiently accurate to predict the risk and prognostic factors of PCBM, allowing for individualized clinical decisions for future clinical work.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Bone metastasis as primary presentation of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A case report and literature review [J].
Argentiero, Antonella ;
Calabrese, Angela ;
Solimando, Antonio Giovanni ;
Notaristefano, Antonio ;
Panarelli, Marzia M. G. ;
Brunetti, Oronzo .
CLINICAL CASE REPORTS, 2019, 7 (10) :1972-1976
[2]   Nomograms in oncology: more than meets the eye [J].
Balachandran, Vinod P. ;
Gonen, Mithat ;
Smith, J. Joshua ;
DeMatteo, Ronald P. .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2015, 16 (04) :E173-E180
[3]   Identifying the Most Informative Prediction Tool for Cancer-specific Mortality After Radical Prostatectomy: Comparative Analysis of Three Commonly Used Preoperative Prediction Models [J].
Boehm, Katharina ;
Larcher, Alessandro ;
Beyer, Burkhard ;
Tian, Zhe ;
Tilki, Derya ;
Steuber, Thomas ;
Karakiewicz, Pierre I. ;
Heinzer, Hans ;
Graefen, Markus ;
Budaeus, Lars .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (06) :1038-1043
[4]   X-tile: A new bio-informatics tool for biomarker assessment and outcome-based cut-point optimization [J].
Camp, RL ;
Dolled-Filhart, M ;
Rimm, DL .
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2004, 10 (21) :7252-7259
[5]   FOLFIRINOX versus Gemcitabine for Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer [J].
Conroy, Thierry ;
Desseigne, Francoise ;
Ychou, Marc ;
Bouche, Olivier ;
Guimbaud, Rosine ;
Becouarn, Yves ;
Adenis, Antoine ;
Raoul, Jean-Luc ;
Gourgou-Bourgade, Sophie ;
de la Fouchardiere, Christelle ;
Bennouna, Jaafar ;
Bachet, Jean-Baptiste ;
Khemissa-Akouz, Faiza ;
Pere-Verge, Denis ;
Delbaldo, Catherine ;
Assenat, Eric ;
Chauffert, Bruno ;
Michel, Pierre ;
Montoto-Grillot, Christine ;
Ducreux, Michel .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2011, 364 (19) :1817-1825
[6]   Remodeling and homeostasis of the extracellular matrix: implications for fibrotic diseases and cancer [J].
Cox, Thomas R. ;
Erler, Janine T. .
DISEASE MODELS & MECHANISMS, 2011, 4 (02) :165-178
[7]   Treatment landscape of metastatic pancreatic cancer [J].
De Dosso, Sara ;
Siebenhuener, Alexander R. ;
Winder, Thomas ;
Meisel, Alexander ;
Fritsch, Ralph ;
Astaras, Christoforos ;
Szturz, Petr ;
Borner, Markus .
CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS, 2021, 96
[8]   More deaths from pancreatic cancer than breast cancer in the EU by 2017 [J].
Ferlay, J. ;
Partensky, C. ;
Bray, F. .
ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2016, 55 (9-10) :1158-1160
[9]   Decision Curve Analysis [J].
Fitzgerald, Mark ;
Saville, Benjamin R. ;
Lewis, Roger J. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2015, 313 (04) :409-410
[10]   Understanding the Bone in Cancer Metastasis [J].
Fornetti, Jaime ;
Welm, Alana L. ;
Stewart, Sheila A. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2018, 33 (12) :2099-2113