Hip Resurfacing Results for Osteonecrosis Are as Good as for Other Etiologies at 2 to 12 Years

被引:45
作者
Amstutz, Harlan C. [1 ]
Le Duff, Michel J. [1 ]
机构
[1] St Vincents Med Ctr, Joint Replacement Inst, Los Angeles, CA 90057 USA
关键词
TERM-FOLLOW-UP; FEMORAL-HEAD; CONSERVE-PLUS; ARTHROPLASTY; OSTEOARTHRITIS; REPLACEMENT; ARTHRITIS; COMPONENT; STEM;
D O I
10.1007/s11999-009-1077-2
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
A bone-conserving prosthetic solution, such as hip resurfacing arthroplasty, is desirable for patients with osteonecrosis (ON) of the femoral head because of their young age. However, many surgeons are reluctant to perform hip resurfacing for ON because of large femoral head defects. To ascertain whether this reluctance is warranted, we determined the mid-to long-term effects of ON on the survivorship, radiographic implant fixation, and disease-specific and quality-of-life scores of hip resurfacing. We compared the results of metal-on-metal resurfacing performed for ON of the hip (including large lesions) with those of resurfacing performed for other causes. The ON group had 70 patients (85 hips) and the control group 768 patients (915 hips) including all other etiologies operated on during the same period. The ON group was younger and had a greater incidence of femoral defects, a smaller component size, and a lower body mass index, three variables previously shown to reduce survivorship in hip resurfacing. We observed no difference in survivorship between the ON group and the control group even after adjusting for head size, body mass index, and defect size. Pain relief, walking, and function scores were comparable postoperatively. The activity level was lower in the ON group. Our data suggest ON is not a contraindication for resurfacing even with large femoral head defects.
引用
收藏
页码:375 / 381
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
AMSTUTZ H, 2008, HIP RESURFACING PRIN, P161
[2]  
AMSTUTZ H, 2008, HIP RESURFACING PRIN, P253
[3]   Eleven years of experience with metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing - A review of 1000 Conserve Plus [J].
Amstutz, Harlan C. ;
Le Duff, Michel J. .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2008, 23 (06) :36-43
[4]   The effects of technique changes on aseptic loosening of the femoral component in hip resurfacing. Results of 600 Conserve Plus with a 3 to 9 year follow-up [J].
Amstutz, Harlan C. ;
Le Duff, Michel J. ;
Campbell, Patricia A. ;
Dorey, Frederick J. .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2007, 22 (04) :481-489
[5]  
Amstutz Harlan C, 2006, J Bone Joint Surg Am, V88 Suppl 1 Pt 2, P234, DOI 10.2106/JBJS.F.00273
[6]   Cementing the Metaphyseal Stem in Metal-on-Metal Resurfacing: When and Why [J].
Amstutz, Harlan C. ;
Le Duff, Michel J. .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2009, 467 (01) :79-83
[7]   TREATMENT OF PRIMARY OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE HIP - A COMPARISON OF TOTAL JOINT AND SURFACE REPLACEMENT ARTHROPLASTY [J].
AMSTUTZ, HC ;
THOMAS, BJ ;
JINNAH, R ;
KIM, W ;
GROGAN, T ;
YALE, C .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1984, 66A (02) :228-241
[8]   Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty:: Two to six-year follow-up study [J].
Amstutz, HC ;
Beaulé, PE ;
Dorey, FJ ;
Le Duff, MJ ;
Campbell, PA ;
Gruen, TA .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2004, 86A (01) :28-39
[9]  
Beaulé PE, 2002, HIP REPLACEMENT: CURRENT TRENDS AND CONTROVERSIES, P261
[10]  
Beaulé PE, 2001, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P104