Elicitation of preferences of Dutch broiler and pig farmers to support decision making on animal welfare

被引:10
作者
Gocsik, Eva [1 ]
van der Lans, Ivo A. [2 ]
Lansink, Alfons G. J. M. Oude [1 ]
Saatkamp, Helmut W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ, Business Econ Grp, Hollandseweg 1, NL-6706 KN Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Wageningen Univ, Mkt & Consumer Behav Grp, Hollandseweg 1, NL-6706 KN Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
Conjoint analysis; Farming systems; Broiler production; Pig production; Preferences; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.1016/j.njas.2015.11.006
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Conjoint analysis was conducted to elicit Dutch broiler and fattening pig farmers' preferences about different characteristics of production systems, with primary interest in farmers' intrinsic motivation towards animal welfare (AW). A cluster analysis was carried out to identify distinct groups of farmers with homogeneous preferences. The results showed that farmers preferred conventional practices and had negative preferences towards free-range systems. Two clusters of broiler farmers were distinguished. The 'Free-range opposed' cluster evaluated a production system by focusing on a single aspect, the provision of free-range access, while the 'Multi-attribute focused' cluster included multiple attributes in their evaluation. In the case of fattening pig farmers, no clusters could be identified. Results showed that farmers do not have a strong intrinsic motivation to switch to a system with higher animal welfare standards. It is therefore likely that the level of on-farm AW will be determined by external and farm-specific factors, and that higher levels of AW will only be achieved if these factors are favorable for the adoption of these production systems. (C) 2015 Royal Netherlands Society for Agricultural Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 86
页数:12
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Baltussen W.H.M., 2010, 2010010 AGR EC RES I
[2]   Entrepreneurial behaviour of Dutch dairy farmers under a milk quota system: goals, objectives and attitudes [J].
Bergevoet, RHM ;
Ondersteijn, CJM ;
Saatkamp, HW ;
van Woerkum, CMJ ;
Huirne, RBM .
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2004, 80 (01) :1-21
[3]  
Bock B., 2010, WELFARE QUALITY REPO
[4]   Attitudes of Dutch Pig Farmers Towards Tail Biting and Tail Docking [J].
Bracke, M. B. M. ;
De Lauwere, Carolien C. ;
Wind, Samantha M. M. ;
Zonerland, Johan J. .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS, 2013, 26 (04) :847-868
[5]   Understanding farmers' decisions with regard to animal welfare: The case of changing to group housing for pregnant sows [J].
de Lauwere, Carolien ;
van Asseldonk, Marcel ;
van't Riet, Jonathan ;
de Hoop, Jitske ;
ten Pierick, Eric .
LIVESTOCK SCIENCE, 2012, 143 (2-3) :151-161
[6]   Modelling farmer decision-making: concepts, progress and challenges [J].
Edwards-Jones, G. .
ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2006, 82 :783-790
[7]  
Ellen H., 2012, 619 WAG U RES CTR LI
[8]  
EZ, 2012, MON DUURZ VOEDS 2012
[9]   SOCIAL DESIRABILITY BIAS AND THE VALIDITY OF INDIRECT QUESTIONING [J].
FISHER, RJ .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1993, 20 (02) :303-315
[10]   A Conceptual Approach for a Quantitative Economic Analysis of Farmers' Decision-Making Regarding Animal Welfare [J].
Gocsik, E. ;
Saatkamp, H. W. ;
de Lauwere, C. C. ;
Lansink, A. G. J. M. Oude .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS, 2014, 27 (02) :287-308