Chest radiography:: ROC phantom study of four different digital systems and one conventional radiographic system

被引:15
作者
Redlich, U [1 ]
Reissberg, S [1 ]
Hoeschen, C [1 ]
Effenberger, O [1 ]
Fessel, A [1 ]
Preuss, H [1 ]
Scherlach, C [1 ]
Döhring, W [1 ]
机构
[1] Otto Von Guericke Univ, Radiol Diagnost Klin, D-39120 Magdeburg, Germany
来源
ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN | 2003年 / 175卷 / 01期
关键词
radiography; digital; chest; receiver operating characteristeric curve (ROC); phantoms; flat panel detector; transparent imaging plate;
D O I
10.1055/s-2003-36609
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare the diagnostic quality of five different radiographic systems used in chest radiography for visualization of differently configured, clinically relevant pathologic pulmonary structures. Materials and Methods: Four digital detector systems using as detection unit a CsI/aSi-based flat panel detector, a transparent imaging plate, a selenium detector and a conventional storage phosphor plate were analyzed for this study, as well as an asymmetrical film-screen system. The analyzed imaging material consisted of radiographs of an anthropomorphic chest-phantom with superimposed simulated pulmonary structures. The images were evaluated for different pathologic structures by a newly developed multiple structure ROC (ms-ROC). Results: The performance of each system was found to have a strong structure-related variability. The flat panel detector system had the best overall performance. The theoretical advantage of the 4k-matrix of the transparent imaging plate over the 3k-matrix of the flat panel detector was only confirmed for reticular structures. Conclusions: In addition to comparing the image quality of the different systems, this study shows that the performance of a radiographic system depends on the structure to be analyzed. The modified ROC (ms-ROC) provides valid results with less effort.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 45
页数:8
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], HDB MED IMAGING
  • [2] Detection of simulated interstitial lung disease and catheters with selenium, storage phosphor, and film-based radiography
    Bernhardt, TM
    Otto, D
    Reichel, G
    Ludwig, K
    Seifert, S
    Kropf, S
    Rapp-Bernhardt, U
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1999, 213 (02) : 445 - 454
  • [3] Biemans JMA, 2002, INVEST RADIOL, V37, P47
  • [4] Clinical comparative study with a large-area amorphous silicon flat-panel detector: Image quality and visibility of anatomic structures on chest radiography
    Fink, C
    Hallscheidt, PJ
    Noeldge, G
    Kampschulte, A
    Radeleff, B
    Hosch, WP
    Kauffmann, GW
    Hansmann, J
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 178 (02) : 481 - 486
  • [5] Digital thoracic radiography using a selenium detector: Prospective comparison with conventional radiography
    Freund, M
    Reuter, M
    Palmie, S
    Harder, E
    Hutzelmann, A
    Heller, M
    [J]. ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 1997, 166 (02): : 101 - 107
  • [6] *FUJ, 2000, I I IM IN FUJ COMP R
  • [7] VALUE OF THE ASYMMETRIC FILM-SCREEN SYSTEM INSIGHT HC IN CHEST IMAGING
    HAUSSLER, MD
    LENZEN, H
    RECKELS, C
    PETERS, PE
    [J]. FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIETE DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER NEUEN BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 1994, 160 (03): : 266 - 270
  • [8] Comparison of the image quality produced by two examination stands for thoracic imaging equipped with a CsI/a-Si flat panel detector respectively a transparent imaging plate with both-side reading using an ROC analysis
    Hoeschen, C
    Reissberg, S
    Effenberger, O
    Fessel, A
    Redlich, U
    Scherlach, C
    Döhring, W
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGING 2001: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2001, 4320 : 24 - 34
  • [9] HOESCHEN C, 2001, MED PHYSIK 2001, P71
  • [10] KAMM KF, 1998, MODERNE BILDGEBUNG, P57