共 21 条
The Basophil Activation Test Is Not a Useful Screening Tool for Hymenoptera Venom-Related Anaphylaxis in Patients with Systemic Mastocytosis
被引:10
作者:
Rietveld, Mark J. A.
[1
]
Schreurs, Marco W. J.
[3
]
van Wijk, Roy Gerth
[2
]
van Daele, Paul L. A.
[1
,2
]
Hermans, Maud A. W.
[1
,2
]
机构:
[1] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med, Clin Immunol Sect, POB 2040, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med, Sect Allergy, POB 2040, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Immunol, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词:
Basophil activation;
Hymenoptera;
Systemic mastocytosis;
SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE;
SKIN-LESIONS;
CD63;
EXPRESSION;
DIAGNOSIS;
ALLERGY;
UTILITY;
TRYPTASE;
FEATURES;
D O I:
10.1159/000444996
中图分类号:
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号:
100102 ;
摘要:
Background: Systemic mastocytosis (SM) patients are at a high risk for anaphylaxis, with Hymenoptera as the main culprit. A screening instrument to identify which patients are sensitized to Hymenoptera before they experience anaphylaxis would therefore be of great value. The basophil activation test (BAT) is proposed as a possible tool for diagnosing Hymenoptera venom-related allergy (HVA), especially in patients in whom conventional allergy tests yield contradictory results. Methods: We included outpatients with SM, according to WHO criteria, from September 2011 to January 2012. Next, to obtain various clinical data including intradermal test results, specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) measurements and BAT were performed. Results: We included 29 patients, 9 of whom had a history of HVA and 4 of whom had experienced anaphylaxis due to other triggers. Sixteen patients had no history of anaphylaxis. sIgE was detected in 6 patients with HVA and in 2 patients with anaphylaxis due to other triggers. The BAT was positive in only 1 patient, in whom the skin test and sIgE were also positive. Compared to patients with skin lesions, those without skin lesions had significantly more anaphylaxis and sIgE to Hymenoptera. During a 3-year follow-up, no one experienced new anaphylactic episodes. Conclusion: The BAT is not a reliable tool for randomly screening SM patients for HVA. (C) 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 129
页数:5