The Basophil Activation Test Is Not a Useful Screening Tool for Hymenoptera Venom-Related Anaphylaxis in Patients with Systemic Mastocytosis

被引:10
作者
Rietveld, Mark J. A. [1 ]
Schreurs, Marco W. J. [3 ]
van Wijk, Roy Gerth [2 ]
van Daele, Paul L. A. [1 ,2 ]
Hermans, Maud A. W. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med, Clin Immunol Sect, POB 2040, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med, Sect Allergy, POB 2040, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Immunol, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Basophil activation; Hymenoptera; Systemic mastocytosis; SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE; SKIN-LESIONS; CD63; EXPRESSION; DIAGNOSIS; ALLERGY; UTILITY; TRYPTASE; FEATURES;
D O I
10.1159/000444996
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: Systemic mastocytosis (SM) patients are at a high risk for anaphylaxis, with Hymenoptera as the main culprit. A screening instrument to identify which patients are sensitized to Hymenoptera before they experience anaphylaxis would therefore be of great value. The basophil activation test (BAT) is proposed as a possible tool for diagnosing Hymenoptera venom-related allergy (HVA), especially in patients in whom conventional allergy tests yield contradictory results. Methods: We included outpatients with SM, according to WHO criteria, from September 2011 to January 2012. Next, to obtain various clinical data including intradermal test results, specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) measurements and BAT were performed. Results: We included 29 patients, 9 of whom had a history of HVA and 4 of whom had experienced anaphylaxis due to other triggers. Sixteen patients had no history of anaphylaxis. sIgE was detected in 6 patients with HVA and in 2 patients with anaphylaxis due to other triggers. The BAT was positive in only 1 patient, in whom the skin test and sIgE were also positive. Compared to patients with skin lesions, those without skin lesions had significantly more anaphylaxis and sIgE to Hymenoptera. During a 3-year follow-up, no one experienced new anaphylactic episodes. Conclusion: The BAT is not a reliable tool for randomly screening SM patients for HVA. (C) 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 129
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [21] The basophil activation test differentiates between patients with wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis and control subjects using gluten and isolated gluten protein types
    Gabler, Angelika Miriam
    Gebhard, Julia
    Eberlein, Bernadette
    Biedermann, Tilo
    Scherf, Katharina Anne
    Brockow, Knut
    CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL ALLERGY, 2021, 11 (06)