Likelihood ratios: getting diagnostic testing into perspective

被引:108
作者
Halkin, A
Reichman, J
Schwaber, M
Paltiel, O
Brezis, M
机构
[1] Hadassah Univ Hosp, Dept Med, IL-91240 Jerusalem, Israel
[2] Hadassah Univ Hosp, Dept Social Med, IL-91120 Jerusalem, Israel
关键词
D O I
10.1093/qjmed/91.4.247
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
In modern medicine, sophisticated laboratory tests and imaging studies are often emphasized at the expense of history and physical examination, rather than complementing clinical assessment. Ancillary testing often fails to advance the diagnostic process, and increases patient risk and the expense of medical care. The relative value of clinical evaluation and technological methods is rarely considered, and the power of the clinical evaluation is therefore underestimated. The likelihood ratio (LR) is a semiquantitative measure of the performance of diagnostic tests which indicates how much a diagnostic procedure modifies the probability of disease, and is calculated from the sensitivity and specificity of the test (or directly from the change in probability associated with the test result). We review the performance of frequently-used tests by their LRs, and compare them to the power of clinical assessment, with clinical cases to illustrate the application of LRs in the diagnostic process. The discriminative power of clinical assessment and ancillary tests is often similar, and the combination of the two greatly increases accuracy in the diagnostic process. Clinical assessment is indeed frequently more informative than current technical modalities. LRs assist in putting the value of testing in proper perspective. practice in evaluating pre-test probabilities of disease and in the application of LRs should be enhanced in medical training.
引用
收藏
页码:247 / 258
页数:12
相关论文
共 80 条
  • [1] A comparison of fecal occult-blood tests for colorectal-cancer screening
    Allison, JE
    Tekawa, IS
    Ransom, LJ
    Adrain, AL
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 334 (03) : 155 - 159
  • [2] Identification and treatment of psychosocial risk factors for coronary artery disease
    Allison, TG
    [J]. MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 1996, 71 (08) : 817 - 819
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1988, CLIN CHEM
  • [4] BLOOD CULTURES
    ARONSON, MD
    BOR, DH
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1987, 106 (02) : 246 - 253
  • [5] BARRETTC.E, 1971, AM REV RESPIR DIS, V103, P845
  • [6] EMOTIONAL SUPPORT AND SURVIVAL AFTER MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION - A PROSPECTIVE, POPULATION-BASED STUDY OF THE ELDERLY
    BERKMAN, LF
    LEOSUMMERS, L
    HORWITZ, RI
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1992, 117 (12) : 1003 - 1009
  • [7] RATIONAL DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT IN UNCLASSIFIED ARTHRITIS - HOW CLINICAL-DATA MAY GUIDE REQUESTS FOR LYME SEROLOGY AND ANTIBIOTIC-TREATMENT
    BLAAUW, I
    DIJKMANS, B
    BOUMA, P
    VANDERLINDEN, S
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 1993, 52 (03) : 206 - 210
  • [8] Cauvain O, 1996, REV MAL RESPIR, V13, P141
  • [9] Centor R M, 1981, Med Decis Making, V1, P239, DOI 10.1177/0272989X8100100304
  • [10] WEIGHTED CRITERIA FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF SYSTEMIC LUPUS-ERYTHEMATOSUS
    CLOUGH, JD
    ELRAZAK, M
    CALABRESE, LH
    VALENZUELA, R
    BRAUN, WB
    WILLIAMS, GW
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1984, 144 (02) : 281 - 285