A systematic review o f the potential uses of on-animal sensors to monitor the welfare of sheep evaluated using the Five Domains Model as a framework

被引:8
作者
Fogarty, E. S. [1 ,2 ]
Swain, D. L. [2 ]
Cronin, G. M. [3 ]
Trotter, M. [2 ]
机构
[1] CQUniv Australia, CQIRP, Ibis Ave, North Rockhampton, Qld 4702, Australia
[2] Inst Future Farming Syst, Sch Med & Appl Sci, Bruce Highway, North Rockhampton, Qld 4702, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Fac Sci SOLES, Camden, NSW, Australia
关键词
animal welfare; Five Domains Model; remote monitoring; sensor; sheep; systematic review; AUTOMATIC CLASSIFICATION-SYSTEM; TECHNICAL-NOTE VALIDATION; GRAZING BEHAVIOR; OVIS-ARIES; HEART-RATE; SPATIAL-DISTRIBUTION; ENERGY-EXPENDITURE; FORAGING BEHAVIOR; RESTING BEHAVIOR; ESTRUS DETECTION;
D O I
10.7120/09627286.28.4.407
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
This systematic review explores the use of on-animal sensors in sheep and their potential application in objective welfare monitoring. The key questions posed were: To what extent can current scientific knowledge inform a sensor-based approach to welfare evaluations? And, how might this knowledge shape development of commercial monitoring systems? These questions were explored through retrospective classification of published sensor applications using The Five Domains (FD) Model as a framework for animal welfare assessment. A total of 71 studies were reviewed. The results indicate studies specifically evaluating the use of sensors for welfare assessment are limited, though many experiments could still be related to some aspect of welfare. The assessment of sensor utilisation revealed the greatest proportion of applications within the 'Behaviour' Domain (90.1%; n = 64), and the lowest within the 'Health' (25.4%; n = 18) and 'Mental state' Domains (25.4%; n = 18). The review also highlights how different sensor types (location, motion or physiological) differ in their applicability for welfare assessment. This paper is the first to classify published sensor applications using the FD Model as a framework and highlights the potential for sensor technology in sheep welfare monitoring. The results suggest that any attempt to create a commercial sensor-based system for objective welfare assessment will require the integration o more than one sensor type, particularly if multiple Domains are to be addressed.
引用
收藏
页码:407 / 420
页数:14
相关论文
共 106 条
  • [1] ALEXANDER G, 1980, Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production, V13, P329
  • [2] Automatic oestrus detection system enables monitoring of sexual behaviour in sheep
    Alhamada, M.
    Debus, N.
    Lurette, A.
    Bocquier, F.
    [J]. SMALL RUMINANT RESEARCH, 2017, 149 : 105 - 111
  • [3] Validation of automated electronic oestrus detection in sheep as an alternative to visual observation
    Alhamada, M.
    Debus, N.
    Lurette, A.
    Bocquier, F.
    [J]. SMALL RUMINANT RESEARCH, 2016, 134 : 97 - 104
  • [4] Using a three-axis accelerometer to identify and classify sheep behaviour at pasture
    Alvarenga, F. A. P.
    Borges, I.
    Palkovic, L.
    Rodina, J.
    Oddy, V. H.
    Dobos, R. C.
    [J]. APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 2016, 181 : 91 - 99
  • [5] Grazing behavior and energy expenditure by sheep and goats co-grazing grass/forb pastures at three stocking rates
    Animut, G
    Goetsch, AL
    Aiken, GE
    Puchala, R
    Detweiler, G
    Krehbiel, CR
    Merkel, RC
    Sahlu, T
    Dawson, LJ
    Johnson, ZB
    Gipson, TA
    [J]. SMALL RUMINANT RESEARCH, 2005, 59 (2-3) : 191 - 201
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2007, ATT EU CIT AN WELF
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2009, Farm animal welfare in Great Britain: Past, present, future
  • [8] Cost analysis of remotely sensed foraging paths in patchy landscapes with plant anti-herbivore defenses (Patagonia, Argentina)
    Ares, Jorge O.
    Dignani, Jorge
    Bertiller, Monica B.
    [J]. LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2007, 22 (09) : 1291 - 1301
  • [9] Australian Farm Institute, 2017, DES BAL EFF FARM AN
  • [10] Estimation of energy intake from heart rate and energy expenditure in sheep under confinement or grazing condition
    Barkai, D
    Landau, S
    Brosh, A
    Baram, H
    Molle, G
    [J]. LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2002, 73 (2-3): : 237 - 246