BRL: A Toolkit for Learning How an Agent Performs Belief Revision

被引:0
作者
Hunter, Aaron [1 ]
Boyarinov, Konstantin [1 ]
机构
[1] BC Inst Technol, Dept Comp, Burnaby, BC, Canada
来源
ICAART: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 14TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AGENTS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE - VOL 3 | 2022年
关键词
Belief Revision; Knowledge Representation; Learning; LOGIC;
D O I
10.5220/0010899100003116
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Belief revision occurs when an agent receives new information that may conflict with their current beliefs. This process can be modelled by a formal belief revision operator. However, in a practical scenario, simply defining abstract revision operators is not sufficient. A truly intelligent agent must be able to observe how others have revised their beliefs in the past, and use this information to predict how they will revise their beliefs in the future. In other words, an agent must be able to learn the mental model that is used by other agents. This process involves combining two traditionally distinct areas of Artificial Intelligence to produce a general reasoning system. In this paper, we discuss challenges faced in using various learning approaches to learn belief revision operators. We then present the BRL toolkit: software can learn the revision operator an agent is using based on past revisions. This is a tool that bridges formal reasoning and machine learning to address a common problem in practical reasoning. Accuracy and efficiency of the approach are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:753 / 756
页数:4
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] ON THE LOGIC OF THEORY CHANGE - PARTIAL MEET CONTRACTION AND REVISION FUNCTIONS
    ALCHOURRON, CE
    GARDENFORS, P
    MAKINSON, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SYMBOLIC LOGIC, 1985, 50 (02) : 510 - 530
  • [2] On the logic of iterated belief revision
    Darwiche, A
    Pearl, J
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 1997, 89 (1-2) : 1 - 29
  • [3] Hunter Aaron, 2018, Advances in Artificial Intelligence. 31st Canadian Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Canadian AI 2018. Proceedings: LNAI 10832, P239, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-89656-4_21
  • [4] Hunter A, 2020, PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-NINTH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, P5219
  • [5] PROPOSITIONAL KNOWLEDGE BASE REVISION AND MINIMAL CHANGE
    KATSUNO, H
    MENDELZON, AO
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 1991, 52 (03) : 263 - 294
  • [6] Revision by History
    Liberatore, Paolo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE RESEARCH, 2015, 52 : 287 - 329
  • [7] Mitchell T., 1997, MACH LEARN, V7, P2, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-4-431-65950-1_
  • [8] Peppas P, 2018, SIXTEENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PRINCIPLES OF KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION AND REASONING, P277
  • [9] Raschka S., 2019, PYTHON MACHINE LEARN, V3rd