Developing a two-sided intervention to facilitate shared decision-making in haemophilia: decision boxes for clinicians and patient decision aids for patients

被引:20
作者
Athale, A. [1 ]
Giguere, A. [2 ]
Barbara, A. [1 ]
Krassova, S.
Iorio, A. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Hlth Informat Res Unit, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Laval, Dept Family Med & Emergency Med, Off Educ & Continuing Profess Dev, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[3] McMaster Univ, Hemophilia Treatment Ctr, Hamilton, ON, Canada
关键词
congenital haemophilia; decision aids; intervention; shared decision-making; IMMUNE TOLERANCE; INHIBITORS; CONSENSUS; QUALITY; RISK; CARE;
D O I
10.1111/hae.12495
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background People with haemophilia face many treatment decisions, which are largely informed by evidence from observational studies. Without evidence-based best' treatment options, patient preferences play a large role in decisions regarding therapy. The shared decision-making (SDM) process allows patients and health care providers to make decisions collaboratively based on available evidence, and patient preferences. Decision tools can help the SDM process. The objective of this project was to develop two-sided decision tools, decision boxes for physicians and patient decision aids for patients, to facilitate SDM for treatment decisions in haemophilia. Methods.Development of the decision tools comprised three phases: topic selection, prototype development and usability testing with targeted end-users. Topics were selected using a Delphi survey. Tool prototypes were based on a previously validated framework and were informed by systematic literature reviews. Patients, through focus groups, and physicians, through interviews, reviewed the prototypes iteratively for comprehensibility and usability. Results. The chosen topics were: (i) prophylactic treatment: when to start and dosing, (ii) choosing factor source and (iii) immunotolerance induction: when to start and dosing. Intended end users (both health care providers and haemophilia patients and caregivers) were engaged in the development process. Overall perception of the decision tools was positive, and the purpose of using the tools was well received. Conclusions. This study demonstrates the feasibility of developing decision tools for haemophilia treatment decisions. It also provides anecdotal evidence of positive perceptions of such tools. Future directions include assessment of the tools' practical value and impact on clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:800 / 806
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Harmonization of clinical trial guidelines for assessing the risk of inhibitor development in hemophilia A treatment [J].
Aledort, L. M. .
JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2011, 9 (03) :423-427
[2]  
[Anonymous], OTT DEC SUPP FRAM
[3]  
[Anonymous], MORVILLES USER EXPER
[4]  
Behera Madhusmita, 2007, Cancer Control, V14, P160
[5]   Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model [J].
Charles, C ;
Gafni, A ;
Whelan, T .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1999, 49 (05) :651-661
[6]   Treatment of hemophilia: a review of current advances and ongoing issues [J].
Coppola, Antonio ;
Di Capua, Mirko ;
Dario, Matteo Nicola ;
Di Minno ;
Di Palo, Mariagiovanna ;
Marrone, Emiliana ;
Ierano, Paola ;
Arturo, Claudia ;
Tufano, Antonella ;
Cerbone, Anna Maria .
JOURNAL OF BLOOD MEDICINE, 2010, 1 :183-195
[7]   Optimizing management of immune tolerance induction in patients with severe haemophilia A and inhibitors: towards evidence-based approaches [J].
Coppola, Antonio ;
Di Minno, Matteo Nicola Dario ;
Santagostino, Elena .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 2010, 150 (05) :515-528
[8]   Immune tolerance in haemophilia: the long journey to the fork in the road [J].
DiMichele, Donna M. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 2012, 159 (02) :123-134
[9]   Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process [J].
Elwyn, Glyn ;
O'Connor, Annette ;
Stacey, Dawn ;
Volk, Robert ;
Edwards, Adrian ;
Coulter, Angela ;
Thomson, Richard ;
Barrat, Alexandra ;
Butow, Phyllis ;
Barry, Michael ;
Mulley, Albert G. ;
Sepucha, Karen ;
Bernstein, Steven ;
Clarke, Aileen ;
Entwistle, Vikki ;
Feldman-Stewart, Deb ;
Holmes-Rovner, Margaret ;
Llewellyn-Thomas, Hilary ;
Moumjid, Nora ;
Ruland, Cornelia ;
Sykes, Alan ;
Whelan, Tim .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 333 (7565) :417-419
[10]   Reduction in uptake of PSA tests following decision aids: systematic review of current aids and their evaluations [J].
Evans, R ;
Edwards, A ;
Brett, J ;
Bradburn, M ;
Watson, E ;
Austoker, J ;
Elwyn, G .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2005, 58 (01) :13-26