Error- and Tamper-Tolerant Decentralized Diagnosability of Discrete Event Systems under Cost Constraints

被引:0
作者
Li, Yuting [1 ]
Hadjicostis, Christoforos N. [2 ]
Wu, Naiqi [1 ]
机构
[1] Macau Univ Sci & Technol, Inst Syst Engn, Taipa 999078, Macau, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Cyprus, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, CY-1678 Nicosia, Cyprus
来源
2021 EUROPEAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (ECC) | 2021年
基金
国家重点研发计划; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
COMMUNICATION DELAYS; FAILURE DIAGNOSIS; CODIAGNOSABILITY; SECURITY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This paper deals with decentralized fault diagnosis for a discrete-event system that is observed at multiple observation sites through communication channels that can be attacked. The fault diagnosis architecture consists of a plant, local observation sites, and a coordinator that is responsible for ultimately diagnosing the faults occurring in the system, as well as communication channels between the various sensing devices and the local observation sites. An attacker, assumed to have full knowledge of the system model and ability to attack a subset of communication channels, aims to inhibit the ability of the coordinator to diagnose a fault. The type of attacks considered in this paper contain symbol insertion, symbol deletion, and symbol replacement attacks, each of which is associated with a positive cost (inversely correlated to the likelihood of the corresponding attack). A communication channel attack affects the outcome of a communication channel (from a sensing device to one of the observation sites) and results in a "local" symbol insertion/deletion/replacement (i.e., only the site associated with the communication channel under attack is affected). We describe a tamper-tolerant decentralized fault diagnosis protocol, which allows the coordinator to perform fault diagnosis despite the possible presence of attacks that are not greater than a certain total cost.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 47
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Robust codiagnosability of discrete event systems
    Basilio, Joao Carlos
    Lafortune, Stephane
    [J]. 2009 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-9, 2009, : 2202 - +
  • [2] Boel RK, 2002, WODES'02: SIXTH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON DISCRETE EVENT SYSTEMS, PROCEEDINGS, P175, DOI 10.1109/WODES.2002.1167685
  • [3] On the effect of communication delays in failure diagnosis of decentralized discrete event systems
    Debouk, R
    Lafortune, S
    Teneketzis, D
    [J]. DISCRETE EVENT DYNAMIC SYSTEMS-THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 2003, 13 (03): : 263 - 289
  • [4] Coordinated decentralized protocols for failure diagnosis of discrete event systems
    Debouk, R
    Lafortune, S
    Teneketzis, D
    [J]. DISCRETE EVENT DYNAMIC SYSTEMS-THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 2000, 10 (1-2): : 33 - 86
  • [5] A survey on security control and attack detection for industrial cyber-physical systems
    Ding, Derui
    Han, Qing-Long
    Xiang, Yang
    Ge, Xiaohua
    Zhang, Xian-Ming
    [J]. NEUROCOMPUTING, 2018, 275 : 1674 - 1683
  • [6] Hadjicostis C. N., 2020, ESTIMATION INFERENCE
  • [7] Quantitative security and safety analysis with attack-fault trees
    Kumar, Rajesh
    Stoelinga, Marielle
    [J]. 2017 IEEE 18TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON HIGH ASSURANCE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING (HASE 2017), 2017, : 25 - 32
  • [8] Li Y. T., 2020, ERROR TAMPER TOLERAN
  • [9] CONTROL OF NETWORKED DISCRETE EVENT SYSTEMS: DEALING WITH COMMUNICATION DELAYS AND LOSSES
    Lin, Feng
    [J]. SIAM JOURNAL ON CONTROL AND OPTIMIZATION, 2014, 52 (02) : 1276 - 1298
  • [10] Polynomial Time Verification of Decentralized Diagnosability of Discrete Event Systems
    Moreira, Marcos V.
    Jesus, Thiago C.
    Basilio, Joao C.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2011, 56 (07) : 1679 - 1684