Minimizing treatment planning errors in proton therapy using failure mode and effects analysis

被引:8
作者
Zheng, Yuanshui [1 ,2 ]
Johnson, Randall [1 ]
Larson, Gary [1 ]
机构
[1] ProCure Proton Therapy Ctr, 5901 W Mem Rd, Oklahoma City, OK 73142 USA
[2] Oklahoma State Univ, Dept Phys, Stillwater, OK 74078 USA
关键词
FMEA; proton therapy; treatment planning; BODY RADIATION-THERAPY; EFFECTS ANALYSIS FMEA; RANGE UNCERTAINTIES; QUALITY-ASSURANCE; RADIOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1118/1.4948686
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) is a widely used tool to evaluate safety or reliability in conventional photon radiation therapy. However, reports about FMEA application in proton therapy are scarce. The purpose of this study is to apply FMEA in safety improvement of proton treatment planning at their center. Methods: The authors performed an FMEA analysis of their proton therapy treatment planning process using uniform scanning proton beams. The authors identified possible failure modes in various planning processes, including image fusion, contouring, beam arrangement, dose calculation, plan export, documents, billing, and so on. For each error, the authors estimated the frequency of occurrence, the likelihood of being undetected, and the severity of the error if it went undetected and calculated the risk priority number (RPN). The FMEA results were used to design their quality management program. In addition, the authors created a database to track the identified dosimetric errors. Periodically, the authors reevaluated the risk of errors by reviewing the internal error database and improved their quality assurance program as needed. Results: In total, the authors identified over 36 possible treatment planning related failure modes and estimated the associated occurrence, detectability, and severity to calculate the overall risk priority number. Based on the FMEA, the authors implemented various safety improvement procedures into their practice, such as education, peer review, and automatic check tools. The ongoing error tracking database provided realistic data on the frequency of occurrence with which to reevaluate the RPNs for various failure modes. Conclusions: The FMEA technique provides a systematic method for identifying and evaluating potential errors in proton treatment planning before they result in an error in patient dose delivery. The application of FMEA framework and the implementation of an ongoing error tracking system at their clinic have proven to be useful in error reduction in proton treatment planning, thus improving the effectiveness and safety of proton therapy. (C) 2016 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:2904 / 2910
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Arjomandy B., 2015, J PROTON THER, V1, P115
  • [2] Application of failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) to pretreatment phases in tomotherapy
    Broggi, Sara
    Cantone, Marie Claire
    Chiara, Anna
    Di Muzio, Nadia
    Longobardi, Barbara
    Mangili, Paola
    Veronese, Ivan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 14 (05): : 265 - 277
  • [3] Application of failure mode and effects analysis to treatment planning in scanned proton beam radiotherapy
    Cantone, Marie Claire
    Ciocca, Mario
    Dionisi, Francesco
    Fossati, Piero
    Lorentini, Stefano
    Krengli, Marco
    Molinelli, Silvia
    Orecchia, Roberto
    Schwarz, Marco
    Veronese, Ivan
    Vitolo, Viviana
    [J]. RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2013, 8
  • [4] Evaluation and critique of Healthcare Failure Mode and Effect Analysis applied in a radiotherapy case study
    Chadwick, Liam
    Fallon, Enda F.
    [J]. HUMAN FACTORS AND ERGONOMICS IN MANUFACTURING & SERVICE INDUSTRIES, 2013, 23 (02) : 116 - 127
  • [5] Ciocca Mario, 2012, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, V82, pe305, DOI 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.05.010
  • [6] Cohen M R, 1994, Hosp Pharm, V29, P319
  • [7] The Use of Failure Mode and Effect Analysis in a Radiation Oncology Setting: The Cancer Treatment Centers of America Experience
    Denny, Diane S.
    Allen, Debra K.
    Worthington, Nicole
    Gupta, Digant
    [J]. JOURNAL FOR HEALTHCARE QUALITY, 2014, 36 (01) : 18 - 28
  • [8] EVALUATION OF SAFETY IN A RADIATION ONCOLOGY SETTING USING FAILURE MODE AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS
    Ford, Eric C.
    Gaudette, Ray
    Myers, Lee
    Vanderver, Bruce
    Engineer, Lilly
    Zellars, Richard
    Song, Danny Y.
    Wong, John
    DeWeese, Theodore L.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2009, 74 (03): : 852 - 858
  • [9] Huq M. S., MED PHYS IN PRESS
  • [10] A method for evaluating quality assurance needs in radiation therapy
    Huq, M. Saiful
    Fraass, Benedick A.
    Dunscombe, Peter B.
    Gibbons, John P., Jr.
    Ibbott, Geoffrey S.
    Medin, Paul M.
    Mundt, Arno
    Mutic, Sassa
    Palta, Jatinder R.
    Thomadsen, Bruce R.
    Williamson, Jeffrey F.
    Yorke, Ellen D.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 71 (01): : S170 - S173