The influence of text cohesion and picture detail on young readers' knowledge of science topics

被引:7
作者
Desiron, Juliette C. [1 ]
de Vries, Erica [2 ]
Bartel, Anna N. [3 ]
Varahamurti, Nalini [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Geneva, 40 Blvd Pont dArve, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland
[2] Univ Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Madison, WI USA
[4] Calif State Univ Chico, Chico, CA 95929 USA
关键词
knowledge; multimedia learning; picture detail; primary school readers; science learning; text cohesion; text-picture processing; CHILDRENS COMPREHENSION; ILLUSTRATIONS; MEMORY; CONSTRUCTION; MOTIVATION; RETENTION; COHERENCE; ATTITUDES; PICTORIAL; IMAGES;
D O I
10.1111/bjep.12195
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
Background and AimThe effects of text cohesion and added pictures on acquired knowledge have been heavily studied each in isolation. Furthermore, studies on the effects of specific characteristics of pictures, whether facilitating or hindering, are scarce. Schnotz's ITCP Model (2014) allows to formulate hypotheses regarding the combined effect of text cohesion and presence and level of detail of a picture. This study investigates these hypotheses in the case of children reading scientific texts. SampleOne hundred and one-second-, third-, and fourth-grade pupils with a mean age of 9years, in the western United States. MethodsData were collected over three sessions to encompass an understanding of each pupil's knowledge based on prior sessions. Results and ConclusionsResults showed a significant increase in pupils' knowledge between pre-test and immediate post-test, but as hypothesized, no significant difference between levels of cohesion. No significant difference between types of pictures was detected. After 1week, knowledge built with a high cohesive text significantly dropped with low-detail picture, whereas, with high detail, or no picture, there was no significant difference. Results suggested that when participants were given a low-detail picture with a low cohesive text, the integration process of the material was more restricted than with a high cohesive text.
引用
收藏
页码:465 / 479
页数:15
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   MULTIPLE INDICATORS OF CHILDRENS READING HABITS AND ATTITUDES - CONSTRUCT-VALIDITY AND COGNITIVE CORRELATES [J].
ALLEN, L ;
CIPIELEWSKI, J ;
STANOVICH, KE .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 84 (04) :489-503
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, CAMBRIDGE HDB MULTIM, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139547369.006
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning
[4]   Dimensions of children's motivation for reading and their relations to reading activity and reading achievement [J].
Baker, L ;
Wigfield, A .
READING RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 1999, 34 (04) :452-477
[5]   Inference making ability and its relation to comprehension failure in young children [J].
Cain, K ;
Oakhill, JV .
READING AND WRITING, 1999, 11 (5-6) :489-503
[6]   Pictorial illustrations still improve students' learning from text [J].
Carney, RN ;
Levin, JR .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2002, 14 (01) :5-26
[7]   Explaining the split-attention effect: Is the reduction of extraneous cognitive load accompanied by an increase in germane cognitive load? [J].
Cierniak, Gabriele ;
Scheiter, Katharina ;
Gerjets, Peter .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2009, 25 (02) :315-324
[8]   Metaphorical graphics aid learning and memory [J].
Danielson, Robert W. ;
Schwartz, Neil H. ;
Lippmann, Marie .
LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 2015, 39 :194-205
[9]   CURRICULUM-BASED MEASUREMENT - THE EMERGING ALTERNATIVE [J].
DENO, SL .
EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN, 1985, 52 (03) :219-232
[10]  
DIGDON N, 1985, ECTJ-EDUC COMMUN TEC, V33, P139