Comparison of 3D conformal and intensity modulated radiotherapy in early stage oral tongue cancer: dosimetric and radiobiological evaluation

被引:2
|
作者
Shanei, A. [1 ]
Abedi, I. [1 ]
Saadatmand, P. [1 ]
Amouheidari, A. R. [2 ]
Akbari-Zadeh, H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Isfahan Univ Med Sci, Sch Med, Dept Med Phys, Esfahan, Iran
[2] Isfahan Milad Gen Hosp, Radiat Oncol Dept, Esfahan, Iran
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH | 2020年 / 18卷 / 01期
关键词
Oral cavity cancer; oral tongue cancer; 3D conformal radiation therapy; intensity modulated radiotherapy; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; NECK-CANCER; RADIATION-THERAPY; ARC THERAPY; HEAD; HYPOTHYROIDISM; STATISTICS; PREDICTORS; PATTERNS; TCP;
D O I
10.18869/acadpub.ijrr.18.1.33
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: The aim of this study was to compare the dosimetric and radiobiological efficiency of various intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) techniques with 3D conventional radiotherapy (3D-CRT) technique in the treatment of early stage oral tongue cancer. Materials and Methods: This study was performed on 38 CT images of patients who were planned with 3D-CRT and three sets of IMRT treatment plans including five, seven and nine fields with prescribed dose of 66 Gy to planning target volume. The dose volume histograms, homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of main organs at risk were derived using Prowess Panther treatment planning system. Results: The results of this study indicated an increase in HI and CI for IMRT plans compared to 3D-CRT. Furthermore, IMRT techniques led to a statistically significant reduction in received dose by mandible (up to 10.10 Gy) and thyroid (up to 13.59 Gy) compared to the conventional technique used; whereas, it led to a statistically significant increase in received dose by parotid glands (up to 7.62 Gy) and brain stem (up to 9.87 Gy). In addition, IMRT increased (up to 12.79%) the probability of occurrence of parotid xerostomia and decreased mandibular complications (up to 7.76%) in comparison to conventional treatment. Conclusions: It can be concluded that IMRT can be more successful in improving oral tongue cancer treatment with more conformity and homogeneity. However, IMRT may not be required for all patients with oral tongue cancer at early stage of the disease.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 42
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Dosimetric Comparison of 3-Dimensional Conformal and Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Planning Techniques in Breast Cancer
    Sirin Ozdemir, Beyza
    Kirecci, Orkun
    UHOD-ULUSLARARASI HEMATOLOJI-ONKOLOJI DERGISI, 2019, 29 (04): : 191 - 197
  • [32] Whole pelvic radiotherapy for prostate cancer using 3D conformal and intensity-modulated radiotherapy
    Ashman, JB
    Zelefsky, MJ
    Hunt, MS
    Leibel, SA
    Fuks, Z
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 63 (03): : 765 - 771
  • [33] DOSIMETRIC COMPARISON BETWEEN INTENSITY-MODULATED WITH COPLANAR FIELD AND 3D CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPY WITH NONCOPLANAR FIELD FOR POSTOCULAR INVASION TUMOR
    Tu Wenyong
    Liu Lu
    Zeng Jun
    Yin Weidong
    Li Yun
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2010, 35 (02) : 128 - 134
  • [34] Comparison of 3D Conformal Radiotherapy (3DCRT) and Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) in Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
    McCloskey, P. M.
    Atallah, S.
    Coate, L.
    Albert-Green, A.
    Hope, A. J.
    Cho, J.
    Brade, A. M.
    Sun, A.
    Shepherd, F. A.
    Bezjak, A.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2012, 7 (09) : S213 - S213
  • [35] Dosimetric comparison of field in field intensity-modulated radiotherapy technique with conformal radiotherapy techniques in breast cancer
    Tülay Ercan
    Şefik İğdem
    Gül Alço
    Funda Zengin
    Selin Atilla
    Maktav Dinçer
    Sait Okkan
    Japanese Journal of Radiology, 2010, 28 : 283 - 289
  • [36] Dosimetric comparison of field in field intensity-modulated radiotherapy technique with conformal radiotherapy techniques in breast cancer
    Ercan, Tuelay
    Igdem, Sefik
    Alco, Guel
    Zengin, Funda
    Atilla, Selin
    Dincer, Maktav
    Okkan, Sait
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2010, 28 (04) : 283 - 289
  • [37] CLINICAL REALIZATION OF 3D CONFORMAL INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY
    BUTLER, EB
    WOO, SY
    GRANT, W
    NIZIN, PS
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1995, 32 (05): : 1547 - 1548
  • [38] Dosimetric Comparison of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT), 3D Conformal Proton Therapy and Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) for Metastatic Brain Cancer
    Sullivan, M.
    Ahmad, S.
    Jin, H.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (06)
  • [39] Dosimetric Evaluation of Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy and Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy Treatment Plans for Prostate Cancer
    Adeneye, Samuel
    Akpochafor, Michael
    Habeebu, Muhammad
    Omojola, Akintayo
    Joseph, Adedayo
    Awhariado, John
    Durosinnmi-Etti, Abayomi
    Aweda, Moses
    TURK ONKOLOJI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY, 2021, 36 (01): : 104 - 111
  • [40] A COMPARISON OF HELICAL INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY, INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY, AND 3D-CONFORMAL RADIATION THERAPY FOR PANCREATIC CANCER
    Poppe, Matthew M.
    Narra, Venkat
    Yue, Ning J.
    Zhou, Jinghao
    Nelson, Carl
    Jabbour, Salma K.
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2011, 36 (04) : 351 - 357