Climate policy and induced R&D: How great is the effect?

被引:7
作者
Shiell, Leslie [1 ]
Lyssenko, Nikita [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, Dept Econ, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
[2] Mem Univ Newfoundland, Dept Econ, St John, NF A1C 5S7, Canada
关键词
Induced technological change; Climate policy modeling; INDUCED TECHNOLOGICAL-CHANGE; CO2; ABATEMENT; INNOVATION; CARBON; MODEL; STABILIZATION; ECONOMICS; ENTICE; TAXES;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2014.09.017
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Carbon taxes or tradable permit systems to address climate change may induce research and development in energy-related technologies. We construct a single-knowledge-stock model of R&D, growth and climate to assess the importance of this effect. The contribution of induced R&D is shown to be very sensitive to (i) the duplication externality, (ii) the feasibility of dedicated research subsidies to internalize inter-firm knowledge spillovers, (iii) the opportunity cost of R&D, (iv) the initial level of research expenditure, and (v) the elasticity of substitution between energy and other factors of production. In contrast, the direction and scale of the inter-temporal research spillover are of secondary importance. We find strong support for Rezai's (2011) argument that, when the business-as-usual scenario (no policy) is modeled appropriately (all externalities treated as external), sacrifices for early generations associated with optimal climate policy are minor or non-existent. Employing our preferred selections for the parameters, we find that adding an induced R&D component to the model increases the welfare impact of the first-best policy (optimally chosen carbon tax and research subsidies) by an average value of more than 400%, and of the second-best policy (carbon tax alone) by approximately 22%. (c) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 294
页数:16
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Directed technical change
    Acemoglu, D
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2002, 69 (04) : 781 - 809
  • [2] The Environment and Directed Technical Change
    Acemoglu, Daron
    Aghion, Philippe
    Bursztyn, Leonardo
    Hemous, David
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 102 (01) : 131 - 166
  • [3] Barr J.L., 1967, INDIAN EC REV, V1, P1
  • [4] Boardman A.E., 2006, Cost-benefit analysis, concepts and practice, V3rd
  • [5] Bosetti V, 2006, ENERG J, P191
  • [6] Endogenous induced technical change and the costs of Kyoto
    Buonanno, P
    Carraro, C
    Galeotti, M
    [J]. RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2003, 25 (01) : 11 - 34
  • [7] Edenhofer O, 2006, ENERG J, P57
  • [8] Environmental and technology policies for climate mitigation
    Fischer, Carolyn
    Newell, Richard G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2008, 55 (02) : 142 - 162
  • [9] Methodological and empirical flaws in the design and application of simple climate-economy models
    Fuessel, H.-M.
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2007, 81 (02) : 161 - 185
  • [10] Innovation and Climate Change Policy
    Gans, Joshua S.
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-ECONOMIC POLICY, 2012, 4 (04) : 125 - 145