Minimally Invasive Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement is Associated With Improved Outcomes in Patients With Left Ventricular Dysfunction

被引:2
|
作者
Concistre, Giovanni [1 ]
Bianchi, Giacomo [1 ]
Chiaramonti, Francesca [1 ]
Margaryan, Rafik [1 ]
Marchi, Federica [1 ]
Kallushi, Enkel [1 ]
Solinas, Marco [1 ]
机构
[1] Fdn CNR G Monasterio, G Pasquinucci Heart Hosp, Dept Adult Cardiac Surg, Massa, Italy
关键词
aortic valve replacement; sutureless aortic bioprosthesis; echocardiography; left ventricular dysfunction; minimally invasive surgery; LOW EJECTION FRACTION; SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE; HIGH-RISK PATIENTS; SYSTOLIC FUNCTION; STENOSIS; TRANSCATHETER; IMPLANTATION; IMMEDIATE; SURVIVAL; BIOPROSTHESIS;
D O I
10.1177/1556984519872990
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Patients with severe aortic stenosis and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) have a poor prognosis compared with patients with preserved LVEF.To evaluate the impact of sutureless Perceval (Livallova, Italy) aortic bioprosthesis on LVEF and clinical outcomes in patients with baseline left ventricular (LV) dysfunction who underwent isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR). Methods: Between March 2011 and August 2017, 803 patients underwent AVR with Perceval bioprosthesis implantation. Fifty-two isolated AVR had preoperative LVEF <= 45%. Mean age of these patients was 77 +/- 6 years, 24 patients were female (46%), and mean EuroSCORE 11 was 9.4% +/- 4.8%. Perceval bioprosthesis was implanted in 9 REDO operations. In 43 patients (83%), AVR was performed in minimally invasive surgery with an upper ministernotomy (n = 13) or right anterior minithoracotomy (n = 30). Results: One patient died in hospital. Cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamp times were 85.5 +/- 26 minutes and 55.5 +/- 19 minutes, respectively.At mean follow-up of 33 +/- 20 months (range: I to 75 months), survival was 90%, freedom from reoperation was 100%, and mean transvalvular pressure gradient was 11 +/- 5 mmHg. LVEF improved from 37% +/- 7% preoperatively to 43% +/- 8% at discharge (P < 0.01) and further increased to 47% +/- 9% at follow-up (P = 0.06), LV mass decreased from 149.8 +/- 16.9 g/m(2) preoperatively to 115.3 +/- 11.6 g/m(2) at follow-up (P < 0.001), and moderate paravalvular leakage occurred in I patient without hemolysis not requiring any treatment. Conclusions: AVR with sutureless aortic bioprosthesis implantation in patients with preoperative LV dysfunction demonstrated a significant immediate and early improvement in LVEF.
引用
收藏
页码:445 / 452
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement with sutureless valves
    Glauber M.
    Lio A.
    Ferrarini M.
    Miceli A.
    Montisci A.
    Donatelli F.
    Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2018, 34 (Suppl 2) : 160 - 164
  • [2] Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement: A Rapid Deployment, Minimally Invasive Alternative in Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement
    O'Sullivan, K. E.
    Murphy, A.
    Casserley, I
    Sugrue, D.
    Hurley, J.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2013, 182 : S376 - S377
  • [3] Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement in a Patient with Transfemoral Aortic Valve Replacement and Left Ventricular Hypertrophy
    Christ, Torsten
    Dohmen, Pascal M.
    Laule, Michael
    Stangl, Karl
    Konertz, Wolfgang
    THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGEON REPORTS, 2016, 5 (01): : 21 - 23
  • [4] Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement using the Perceval S sutureless valve
    Misfeld, Martin
    ANNALS OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2015, 4 (02) : 203 - 205
  • [5] Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis in Patients With Left Ventricular Dysfunction
    Halkos, Michael E.
    Chen, Edward P.
    Sarin, Eric L.
    Kilgo, Patrick
    Thourani, Vinod H.
    Lattouf, Omar M.
    Vega, J. David
    Morris, Cullen D.
    Vassiliades, Thomas
    Cooper, William A.
    Guyton, Robert A.
    Puskas, John D.
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2009, 88 (03): : 746 - 751
  • [6] Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement with Minimally Invasive Method: Case Report
    Ozer, Abdullah
    Ugurlu, Okan
    Sarkilar, Gamze
    Ege, Erdal
    Sarigul, Ali
    GAZI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 27 (01): : 21 - +
  • [7] Exploring the learning curve for minimally invasive sutureless aortic valve replacement
    Murzi, Michele
    Cerillo, Alfredo Giuseppe
    Gilmanov, Danyar
    Concistre, Giovanni
    Farneti, Pierandrea
    Glauber, Mattia
    Solinas, Marco
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2016, 152 (06): : 1537 - +
  • [8] Results of aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis associated with severe left ventricular dysfunction
    Bakkali, Abderrahmane
    Jaabari, Imad
    Dadji, Claude Koulekey
    Sayah, Rochde
    Laaroussi, Mohamed
    PAN AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 29
  • [9] Aortic valve replacement in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction
    Abhishek Parmar
    MN Ravi
    PV Rao
    Kumar Praveen
    DP Shetty
    Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2006, 22 (1) : 57 - 57
  • [10] MINIMALLY INVASIVE AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT IMPROVES OUTCOMES OF REOPERATIVE AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT
    Gosev, I.
    McGurk, S.
    Kaneko, T.
    Loberman, D.
    Neely, R. C.
    Javed, Q.
    Leacche, M.
    Cohn, L. H.
    Aranki, S. F.
    CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 128 : 152 - 152