A Reasoning System about Bi-Agent Knowledge Sharing

被引:0
作者
Gao, Jinsheng [1 ]
Zhou, Changle [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Xiamen Univ, Dept Philosophy, Xiamen 361005, Fujian, Peoples R China
[2] Xiamen Univ, Fujian Keylab Brain Like Intelligent Syst, Xiamen 361005, Fujian, Peoples R China
[3] Xiamen Univ, Dept CognitiveSci & Technol, Xiamen 361005, Fujian, Peoples R China
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MECHATRONICS, MATERIALS, CHEMISTRY AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING 2015 (ICMMCCE 2015) | 2015年 / 39卷
关键词
Dynamic epistemic logic; Common knowledge; Knowledge sharing; LOGICS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
In the field of artificial intelligence and computer science, Dynamic Epistemic Logic (DEL) is often used to model the knowledge, the inference in multi-agentknowledge, the action reasoningin game, and so on. This is because, unlike the general static epistemic logic, the dynamic perception can express the knowledge update in the multi-agent interaction. This paper, after analyzing some kinds of knowledge involved in the multi-agent interaction, proposes a Knowledge Sharing System (KSS) that extends the epistemic language with a new operator of 'knowledge sharing' for bi-agent interaction. Its soundness and completeness will beproved, and some properties about it will be analyzed in this paper. This system offers a clear presentation of how an agent gets to understand the other's intentions through the action of "sharing", which allows further interaction.
引用
收藏
页码:110 / 118
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Using background knowledge in case-based legal reasoning: A computational model and an intelligent learning environment [J].
Aleven, V .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2003, 150 (1-2) :183-237
[2]  
Allo P., 2013, SERIES LOGIC EPISTEM, V30, P339
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1969, Conventions, a philosophical study
[4]   AGREEING TO DISAGREE [J].
AUMANN, RJ .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 1976, 4 (06) :1236-1239
[5]  
Baltag A., 2015, J PHILOS LOGIC, P1
[6]  
Blackburn Patrick, 2001, Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science, V53
[7]  
Fagin R., 1995, Reasoning about Knowledge
[8]  
Gettier E.L., 1963, ANALYSIS, V23, P121
[9]   A GUIDE TO COMPLETENESS AND COMPLEXITY FOR MODAL-LOGICS OF KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF [J].
HALPERN, JY ;
MOSES, Y .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 1992, 54 (03) :319-379
[10]  
Hintikka J., 1962, KNOWLEDGE BELIEF INT