In-vivo and in-vitro comparison of bond strengths of orthodontic brackets bonded to enamel and debonded at various times

被引:51
作者
Hajrassie, Manar K. A.
Khier, Salwa E.
机构
[1] King Saud Univ, Orthodontists Div, Riyadh 1145, Saudi Arabia
[2] King Fahad Hosp, Minist Hlth, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.06.025
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Introduction: The purpose of this study was to measure and compare in-vivo and in-vitro bond strengths of orthodontic brackets bonded to human enamel and debonded at various times. An in-vivo debonding device was validated and used to measure bond strengths in the oral environment. Methods: For the in-vitro study, mini-twin metallic premolar brackets (Opti-mesh XRT, Oromco Corp, Glendora, Calif) precoated with Transbond XT composite resin (3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif) were bonded to 60 extracted premolars. The teeth were divided into 4 groups of 15, and shear bond strength was tested on a universal testing machine at 4 time periods: 10 minutes, 24 hours, 1 week, and 4 weeks. For the in-vivo test, 60 premolars in 22 volunteers (dental students) from King Saud University were bonded with Mini-Twin metallic premolar brackets and divided into 4 groups; bond strengths were measured at 10 minutes, 24 hours, 1 week, and 4 weeks. Results: Statistical analysis with 1-way ANOVA at P < .05 showed no significant differences among the in-vitro or the in-vivo groups. Two-way ANOVA at P < .05 was used to compare the in-vitro results with the in-vivo results; the in-vivo group had significantly lower mean bond strength values. In addition, survival analysis, used to calculate the probability of bond failure at P < .05, confirmed the significant difference between in-vitro and in-vivo environments. Conclusions: Reported bond strength values are not time dependent.
引用
收藏
页码:384 / 390
页数:7
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
BRANTLEY WA, 2001, ORTHODONTIC MAT SCI, P11
[2]  
Buonocore MG., 1955, J DENT RES, V34, P849, DOI DOI 10.1177/00220345550340060801
[3]   Time-related bond strengths of light-cured and chemically cured bonding systems: An in vitro study [J].
Chamda, RA ;
Stein, E .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1996, 110 (04) :378-382
[4]  
Cox DR., 1984, ANAL SURVIVAL DATA
[5]   POLYMERIZATION EFFICIENCY OF CHEMICALLY CURED AND VISIBLE-LIGHT-CURED ORTHODONTIC ADHESIVES - DEGREE OF CURE [J].
ELIADES, T ;
ELIADES, G ;
BRANTLEY, WA ;
JOHNSTON, WM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1995, 108 (03) :294-301
[6]   The inappropriateness of conventional orthodontic bond strength assessment protocols [J].
Eliades, T ;
Brantley, WA .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2000, 22 (01) :13-23
[7]  
Fox N A, 1994, Br J Orthod, V21, P33
[8]  
JERROLD HZ, 1996, BIOSTATISTICAL ANAL
[9]   Torsional bond strength and failure pattern of ceramic brackets bonded to composite resin laminate veneers [J].
Kao, EC ;
Eliades, T ;
Rezvan, E ;
Johnston, WM .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 1995, 17 (06) :533-540
[10]   BOND STRENGTH OF LIGHT-CURE FLUORIDE-RELEASING BASE-LINERS AS ORTHODONTIC BRACKET ADHESIVES [J].
MCCOURT, JW ;
COOLEY, RL ;
BARNWELL, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1991, 100 (01) :47-52