New rights for forest-based communities? Understanding processes of forest tenure reform

被引:83
作者
Larson, A. M. [1 ]
Barry, D. [2 ]
Dahal, Ganga Ram [3 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Int Forestry Res, Managua, Nicaragua
[2] Rights & Resources Initiat, Washington, DC USA
[3] Rights & Resources Initiat, Bangkok, Thailand
关键词
property rights; community forestry; conservation; livelihoods; deforestation; indigenous peoples; INDIGENOUS PEOPLES; NATURAL-RESOURCES; PROPERTY-RIGHTS; CONSERVATION; MANAGEMENT; DECENTRALIZATION; INSIGHTS; POLICY; ANTHROPOLOGY; GOVERNANCE;
D O I
10.1505/ifor.12.1.78
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
This article reports on findings from a research project, in more than 30 sites in 10 countries in Africa, Asia and Latin America, aimed at analyzing cases where changes in formal tenure rights for forest-based communities had recently occurred or were in process. Though by far largest proportion of the world's forests are owned by the state, over a quarter of forests in developing countries are now owned by or assigned to communities. This suggests, at least in some ways, a marked departure from the historic trend towards centralizing. The project, led by the Center for International Forestry Research in coordination with the Rights and Resources Initiative in 2006-2008, sought to identify issues and concerns from the perspective of socially and economically vulnerable groups that were seeking rights reforms. The objectives were to understand reform processes, particularly the extent to which community rights had improved in practice. This article reports on the analysis of three aspects of the reforms: the broad global trends shaping them, challenges in implementation and outcomes for livelihoods and forests.
引用
收藏
页码:78 / 96
页数:19
相关论文
共 149 条
[1]   Twenty-four years of community forestry in Nepal [J].
Acharya, KP .
INTERNATIONAL FORESTRY REVIEW, 2002, 4 (02) :149-156
[2]  
Adams W.M., 2004, EXTINCTION STORY CON
[3]   Explaining success on the commons: Community forest governance in the Indian Himalaya [J].
Agrawal, A ;
Chhatre, A .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2006, 34 (01) :149-166
[4]   Collective action, property rights, and decentralization in resource use in India and Nepal [J].
Agrawal, A ;
Ostrom, E .
POLITICS & SOCIETY, 2001, 29 (04) :485-514
[5]  
Agrawal A, 1999, J DEV AREAS, V33, P473
[6]  
AGRAWAL A, 2008, PROTECTED AREAS HUMA
[7]   State involvement and forest co-governance: Evidence from the Indian Himalayas [J].
Agrawal, Arun ;
Chhatre, Ashwini .
STUDIES IN COMPARATIVE INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, 2007, 42 (1-2) :67-86
[8]  
Agrawal Arun., 2008, Decentralization, Forests and Rural Communities: Policy Outcomes in Southeast Asia, by
[9]  
Agrawal Arun., 2005, ENVIRONMENTALITY TEC
[10]  
Anaya S.J., 2002, ARIZONA J INT COMP L, V19, P1