Jet mixing optimization using machine learning control

被引:33
作者
Wu, Zhi [1 ,2 ]
Fan, Dewei [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Yu [1 ,2 ]
Li, Ruiying [3 ]
Noack, Bernd R. [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Harbin Inst Technol, Inst Turbulence Noise Vibrat Interact & Control, Shenzhen Campus, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[2] Digital Engn Lab Offshore Equipment, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Poitiers, CNRS, Inst PPRIME, ISAE,ENSMA, F-86962 Futuroscope, France
[4] Campus Univ Orsay, CNRS, LIMSI, Rue John Neumann,Bat 508, F-91403 Orsay, France
[5] Tech Univ Berlin, ISTA, Muller Breslau Str 8, D-10623 Berlin, Germany
关键词
CLOSED-LOOP CONTROL; EXTREMUM-SEEKING; SUBHARMONIC RESONANCE; SQUARE CYLINDER; FLOW-CONTROL; FREQUENCY; MANIPULATION; AMPLITUDE;
D O I
10.1007/s00348-018-2582-4
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
We experimentally optimize mixing of a turbulent round jet using machine learning control (MLC) following Li et al. (Exp Fluids 58(article 103):1-20, 2017). The jet is manipulated with one unsteady minijet blowing in wall-normal direction close to the nozzle exit. The flow is monitored with two hotwire sensors. The first sensor is positioned on the centerline five jet diameters downstream of the nozzle exit, i.e. the end of the potential core, while the second is located three jet diameters downstream and displaced towards the shear-layer. The mixing performance is monitored with mean velocity at the first sensor. A reduction of this velocity correlates with increased entrainment near the potential core. MLC is employed to optimize sensor feedback, a general open-loop broadband frequency actuation and combinations of both. MLC has identified the optimal periodic forcing with small duty cycle as the best control policy employing only 400 actuation measurements, each lasting for 5 s. This learning rate is comparable if not faster than typical optimization of periodic forcing with two free parameters (frequency and duty cycle). In addition, MLC results indicate that neither new frequencies nor sensor feedback improves mixing further-contrary to many of other turbulence control experiments. The optimality of pure periodic actuation may be attributed to the simple jet flapping mechanism in the minijet plane. The performance of sensor feedback is shown to face a challenge for small duty cycles. The jet mixing results demonstrate the untapped potential of MLC in quickly learning optimal general control policies, even deciding between open- and closed-loop control. [GRAPHICS] .
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
[11]   Coherent structures in combustion [J].
Coats, CM .
PROGRESS IN ENERGY AND COMBUSTION SCIENCE, 1996, 22 (05) :427-509
[12]   Issues in active flow control: theory, control, simulation, and experiment [J].
Collis, SS ;
Joslin, RD ;
Seifert, A ;
Theofilis, V .
PROGRESS IN AEROSPACE SCIENCES, 2004, 40 (4-5) :237-289
[13]   VARIABLE CONTROL OF JET DECAY [J].
DAVIS, MR .
AIAA JOURNAL, 1982, 20 (05) :606-609
[14]   Genetic programming for prediction and control [J].
Dracopoulos, DC ;
Kent, S .
NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS, 1997, 6 (04) :214-228
[15]  
Duriez T, 2016, FLUID MECH ITS APPL
[16]   Modified Extremum-Seeking Closed-Loop System for Jet Mixing Enhancement [J].
Fan, D. W. ;
Wu, Z. ;
Yang, H. ;
Li, J. D. ;
Zhou, Y. .
AIAA JOURNAL, 2017, 55 (11) :3891-3902
[17]   Jet mixing enhancement by high-amplitude fluidic actuation [J].
Freund, JB ;
Moin, P .
AIAA JOURNAL, 2000, 38 (10) :1863-1870
[18]   The preferred mode of incompressible jets: linear frequency response analysis [J].
Garnaud, X. ;
Lesshafft, L. ;
Schmid, P. J. ;
Huerre, P. .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2013, 716 :189-202
[19]   Flow control with noncircular jets [J].
Gutmark, EJ ;
Grinstein, FF .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF FLUID MECHANICS, 1999, 31 :239-+
[20]   Fifty years of fluidic injection for jet noise reduction [J].
Henderson, Brenda .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AEROACOUSTICS, 2010, 9 (1-2) :91-122