Dempster-Shafer Theory Applied to Uncertainty Surrounding Permeability

被引:18
作者
Mathon, Bree R. [1 ]
Ozbek, Metin M. [2 ]
Pinder, George F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vermont, Sch Engn, Civil & Environm Engn Program, Burlington, VT 05405 USA
[2] ENVIRON Int Corp, Princeton, NJ 08540 USA
关键词
Evidence theory; Groundwater modeling; Permeability; Dempster's rule of combination; Yager's rule; BELIEF FUNCTIONS; COMBINATION;
D O I
10.1007/s11004-009-9246-0
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Typically, if uncertainty in subsurface parameters is addressed, it is done so using probability theory. Probability theory is capable of only handling one of the two types of uncertainty (aleatory), hence epistemic uncertainty is neglected. Dempster-Shafer evidence theory (DST) is an approach that allows analysis of both epistemic and aleatory uncertainty. In this paper, DST combination rules are used to combine measured field data on permeability, along with the expert opinions of hydrogeologists (subjective information) to examine uncertainty. Dempster's rule of combination is chosen as the combination rule of choice primarily due to the theoretical development that exists and the simplicity of the data. Since Dempster's rule does have some criticisms, two other combination rules (Yager's rule and the Hau-Kashyap method) were examined which attempt to correct the problems that can be encountered using Dempster's rule. With the particular data sets used here, there was not a clear superior combination rule. Dempster's rule appears to suffice when the conflict amongst the evidence is low.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 307
页数:15
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Uncertainty quantification using evidence theory in multidisciplinary design optimization
    Agarwal, H
    Renaud, JE
    Preston, EL
    Padmanabhan, D
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2004, 85 (1-3) : 281 - 294
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2004, APPL ADV DSMT INFORM
  • [3] BELITZ K, 1988, AAPG BULL, V72, P1334
  • [4] Slope instability zonation: A comparison between certainty factor and fuzzy Dempster-Shafer approaches
    Binaghi, E
    Luzi, L
    Madella, P
    Pergalani, F
    Rampini, A
    [J]. NATURAL HAZARDS, 1998, 17 (01) : 77 - 97
  • [5] Classification of a complex landscape using Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence
    Cayuela, L.
    Golicher, J. D.
    Salas Rey, J.
    Rey Benayas, J. M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2006, 27 (9-10) : 1951 - 1971
  • [6] UPPER AND LOWER PROBABILITIES INDUCED BY A MULTIVALUED MAPPING
    DEMPSTER, AP
    [J]. ANNALS OF MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS, 1967, 38 (02): : 325 - &
  • [7] A SET-THEORETIC VIEW OF BELIEF FUNCTIONS - LOGICAL OPERATIONS AND APPROXIMATIONS BY FUZZY-SETS
    DUBOIS, D
    PRADE, H
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENERAL SYSTEMS, 1986, 12 (03) : 193 - 226
  • [8] Dubois Didier., 1992, Reliability Data Collection And Analysis, P213
  • [9] FERSON S, 2002, SAND20024015 SAND NA
  • [10] Ferson Scott., 2002, REPRESENTATION PROPA