You are measuring the decision to be fast, not inattention: the Sustained Attention to Response Task does not measure sustained attention

被引：40

作者：

Dang, Jasmine S. ^{[1
]}

Figueroa, Ivonne J. ^{[1
]}

Helton, William S. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] George Mason Univ, Dept Psychol, 4400 Univ Dr, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA

来源：

EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH | 2018年 / 236卷 / 08期

关键词：

Sustained Attention to Response Task; Speed-accuracy trade-off; Within-subject speed-accuracy trade-off (SATO); REACTION-TIME; EXPERIENCE; STATE; MIND; PERFORMANCE; AWARENESS; LAPSE; ERROR; TRAIT;

D O I：

10.1007/s00221-018-5291-6

中图分类号：

Q189 [神经科学];

学科分类号：

071006 ;

摘要：

The Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART) has been widely used in psychological literature as a measure of vigilance (the ability to sustain attention over a prolonged period of time). This task uses a Go/No-Go paradigm and requires the participants to repetitively respond to the stimuli as quickly and as accurately as possible. Previous literature indicates that performance in SART is subjected to a "speed-accuracy trade-off" (SATO) resulting from strategy choices and from the failures of controlling motor reflexes. In this study, 36 participants (n = 36) performed a series of four SARTs. The results support the perspective of strategy choice in SART and suggest that within-subjects SATO in SART should also be acknowledged in attempting to explain SART performance. The implications of the speed-accuracy trade-off should be fully understood when the SART is being used as a measure or tool.

引用

页码：2255 / 2262

页数：8

共 33 条

[1]

ALEXANDER RA, 1990, B PSYCHONOMIC SOC, V28, P335

[2] Editorial: Dynamic Personality Science. Integrating between-Person Stability and within-Person Change [J].

Beckmann, Nadin ;

Wood, Robert E. .

FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 8

[3]

Bedi A, 2015, THESIS

[4] Exposure to restorative environments helps restore attentional capacity [J].

Berto, R .

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 25 (03) :249-259

[5] Anatomy of an error: A bidirectional state model of task engagement/disengagement and attention-related errors [J].

Cheyne, J. Allan ;

Solman, Grayden J. F. ;

Carriere, Jonathan S. A. ;

Smilek, Daniel .

COGNITION, 2009, 111 (01) :98-113

[6] Experience sampling during fMRI reveals default network and executive system contributions to mind wandering [J].

Christoff, Kalina ;

Gordon, Alan M. ;

Smallwood, Jonathan ;

Smith, Rachelle ;

Schooler, Jonathan W. .

PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2009, 106 (21) :8719-8724

[7]

Cohen J., 2003, APPL MULTIPLE REGRES, DOI 10.4324/9780203774441

[8]

Dang J.S., 2017, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, V61, P1829, DOI [10.1177/1541931213601938, DOI 10.1177/1541931213601938]

[9] The effects of warning cues and attention-capturing stimuli on the sustained attention to response task [J].

Finkbeiner, Kristin M. ;

Wilson, Kyle M. ;

Russell, Paul N. ;

Helton, William S. .

EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2015, 233 (04) :1061-1068

[10]

Head J, 2016, EXPT BRAIN RES, P1

← 1 2 3 4 →