A Novel Fuzzy Bayesian Network-HFACS (FBN-HFACS) model for analyzing Human and Organization Factors (HOFs) in process accidents

被引:55
作者
Rostamabadi, Akbar [1 ]
Jahangiri, Mehdi [2 ]
Zarei, Esmaeil [3 ]
Kamalinia, Mojtaba [2 ]
Banaee, Sean [4 ]
Samaei, Mohammad Reza [5 ]
机构
[1] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Sch Hlth, Student Res Comm, Shiraz, Iran
[2] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Inst Hlth, Sch Hlth, Dept Occupat Hlth,Res Ctr Hlth Sci, Shiraz, Iran
[3] Mashhad Univ Med Sci, Fac Hlth, Dept Occupat Hlth & Safety Engn, Mashhad, Razavi Khorasan, Iran
[4] Old Dominion Univ, Coll Hlth Sci, Norfolk, VA USA
[5] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Sch Hlth, Dept Environm Hlth, Shiraz, Iran
关键词
Human factors analysis and classification system; Bayesian network; Fuzzy best worst method; Chemical process industries; CLASSIFICATION-SYSTEM; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.psep.2019.08.012
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Human and organizational factors (HOF) play a significant role in the accident occurrence in chemical process industries (CPI). Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) is a comprehensive framework widely used for analyzing HOFs involved in accidents. HFACS, however, has been criticized due to limitations such as the lack of quantitative analysis and interdependencies consideration among causal factors, and reasoning under uncertain conditions. This paper presents a novel accident analysis model incorporating Bayesian network (BN) and fuzzy Best Worst Method (fuzzy-BWM) into the HFACS framework to overcome the mentioned limitations. In the proposed model, BN is used to promote the ability of HFACS in providing both quantitative assessment and consider conditional dependencies among causal factors, while fuzzy-BWM is applied to relax the difficulties related to uncertainties and insufficient data on human errors and organizational failures. Application of the model was tested for analysis of HOFs in a real accident. The results revealed the capability of the model to quantify the failures and to provide an HFACS framework characterized by a flexible and dynamic analytical capability. The model was also able to identify key safety measures for development of effective intervention strategies in order to prevent future similar accidents. (C) 2019 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 72
页数:14
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Aas AL., 2008, INT PETR TECHN C KUA, DOI [10.2523/IPTC-12694-MS, DOI 10.2523/IPTC-12694-MS]
[2]  
Ahmad M., 2015, P 49 ESREDA SEM
[3]   Accident modelling and analysis in process industries [J].
Al-Shanini, Ali ;
Ahmad, Arshad ;
Khan, Faisal .
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2014, 32 :319-334
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, BAYESIAN NETWORKS DE
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1987, PROJ APPR
[6]  
[Anonymous], 26 C INT COUNC AER S
[7]   Analytical HFACS for investigating human errors in shipping accidents [J].
Celik, Metin ;
Cebi, Selcuk .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2009, 41 (01) :66-75
[8]   Human and organisational factors in maritime accidents: Analysis of collisions at sea using the HFACS [J].
Chauvin, Christine ;
Lardjane, Salim ;
Morel, Gael ;
Clostermann, Jean-Pierre ;
Langard, Benoit .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2013, 59 :26-37
[9]   An investigation of air accidents in Nigeria using the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) framework [J].
Daramola, Adebukola Yewande .
JOURNAL OF AIR TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT, 2014, 35 :39-50
[10]   Assessment of the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS): Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability [J].
Ergai, Awatef ;
Cohen, Tara ;
Sharp, Julia ;
Wiegmann, Doug ;
Gramopadhye, Anand ;
Shappell, Scott .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2016, 82 :393-398