Comparison of Orthogonal Frequency-Division Multiplexing and On-Off Keying in Amplified Direct-Detection Single-Mode Fiber Systems

被引:37
作者
Barros, Daniel J. F. [1 ]
Kahn, Joseph M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
Communications system performance; direct-detection; group-velocity dispersion; intensity modulation; maximum-likelihood sequence detection; maximum-likelihood sequence estimation; multi-carrier optical systems; orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing; DISPERSION; CHANNELS;
D O I
10.1109/JLT.2010.2048999
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
We discuss the use of orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM) for combating group-velocity dispersion (GVD) effects in amplified direct-detection (DD) systems using single-mode fiber. We review known OFDM techniques, including asymmetrically clipped optical OFDM (ACO-OFDM), DC-clipped OFDM (DC-OFDM) and single-sideband OFDM (SSB-OFDM), and derive a linearized channel model for each technique. We present an iterative procedure to achieve optimum power allocation for each OFDM technique, since there is no closed-form solution for amplified DD systems. For each technique, we minimize the optical power required to transmit at a given bit rate and normalized GVD by iteratively adjusting the bias and optimizing the power allocation among the subcarriers. We verify that SSB-OFDM has the best optical power efficiency among the different OFDM techniques. We compare these OFDM techniques to on-off keying (OOK) with maximum-likelihood sequence detection (MLSD) and show that SSB-OFDM can achieve the same optical power efficiency as OOK with MLSD, but at the cost of requiring twice the electrical bandwidth and also a complex quadrature modulator. We compare the computational complexity of the different techniques and show that SSB-OFDM requires fewer operations per bit than OOK with MLSD.
引用
收藏
页码:1811 / 1820
页数:10
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Maximum-likelihood sequence estimation in dispersive optical channels [J].
Agazzi, OE ;
Hueda, MR ;
Carrer, HS ;
Crivelli, DE .
JOURNAL OF LIGHTWAVE TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 23 (02) :749-763
[2]  
ALI A, 2009, P OFC NFOEC 2009
[3]  
ALI A, 2010, P OFC NFOEC 2010
[4]  
Armstrong J., 2006, P IEEE GLOBECOM, P1
[5]   Comparison of asymmetrically clipped optical OFDM and DC-biased optical OFDM in AWGN [J].
Armstrong, Jean ;
Schmidt, Brendon J. C. .
IEEE COMMUNICATIONS LETTERS, 2008, 12 (05) :343-345
[6]   Optimized Dispersion Compensation Using Orthogonal Frequency-Division Multiplexing [J].
Barros, Daniel J. F. ;
Kahn, Joseph M. .
JOURNAL OF LIGHTWAVE TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 26 (13-16) :2889-2898
[7]   Performance Analysis of MLSE Receivers Based on the Square-Root Metric [J].
Bosco, Gabriella ;
Poggiolini, Pierluigi ;
Visintin, Monica .
JOURNAL OF LIGHTWAVE TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 26 (13-16) :2098-2109
[8]   MMSE DECISION-FEEDBACK EQUALIZERS AND CODING .2. CODING RESULTS [J].
CIOFFI, JM ;
DUDEVOIR, GP ;
EYUBOGLU, MV ;
FORNEY, GD .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMMUNICATIONS, 1995, 43 (10) :2595-2604
[9]   Maximum-likelihood sequence detection with closed-form metrics in OOK optical systems impaired by GVD and PMD [J].
Foggi, Tommaso ;
Forestieri, Enrico ;
Colavolpe, Giulio ;
Prati, Giancarlo .
JOURNAL OF LIGHTWAVE TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 24 (08) :3073-3087
[10]   Modulation and coding for linear Gaussian channels [J].
Forney, GD ;
Ungerboeck, G .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY, 1998, 44 (06) :2384-2415