Long-Term Results of Acetabular Reconstruction Using Ganz Acetabular Rings

被引:4
|
作者
Beckmann, Nicholas A. [1 ]
Hasler, Jennifer F. [1 ]
Moradi, Babak [1 ]
Schlegel, Ulf J. [1 ]
Gotterbarm, Tobias [1 ]
Streit, Marcus R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ Hosp, Ctr Orthoped Trauma Surg & Spinal Cord Injury, Clin Orthoped & Trauma Surg, Heidelberg, Germany
来源
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY | 2018年 / 33卷 / 11期
关键词
acetabular revision; revision total hip arthroplasty; Ganz reinforcement ring; long-term follow-up; total hip arthroplasty; THA; TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY; REINFORCEMENT RING; FOLLOW-UP; JOINT REPLACEMENT; JUMBO CUPS; REVISION; HOOK; COMPONENTS; DEFECTS; METAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2018.06.036
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Our study examines the long-term results of acetabular reconstruction using the Ganz acetabular reinforcement ring (GRR) in total hip arthroplasty. Methods: Between 1998 and 2001,135 hips (119 revision and 16 primary arthroplasties) were consecutively implanted with aGRR at our hospital. The average age was 65 years (range, 26-90). Clinical and radiographic evaluations were carried out. Long-term survivorship was estimated using a competing risks analysis, and multivariate survivorship using Cox regression model was used to identify risk factors for implant failure. Results: At a mean follow-up of 16 years (range, 15-18), 3 patients were lost to follow-up and 19 had implant failure: 4 aseptic loosenings without re-revision, 4 septic, and 11 aseptic re-revisions. Survival was estimated at 86% after 16 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 78.5%-90.9%) using radiographic loosening or revision for any reason as the end point. Using aseptic loosening as the end point, the survival was estimated at 91.2% after 16 years (95% CI, 84.5%-95.0%). Multivariate analysis revealed that age at surgery was a significant risk factor for failure of the GRR. With acetabular revision or loosening as the end point, patients <= 60 years had 71.6% (95% CI, 53%-82.8%) and older patients had 92.2% (95% CI, 84%-96.2%) probability of implant survival after a mean 16-year follow-up. The median Harris Hip Scores and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index scores were 77 and 64.5, respectively, and mean Numerical Pain Rating Scale score was 1.6 at final follow-up. Conclusion: Our long-term study showed acceptable survival and functional results using the GRR in older patients, while young patients had less favorable survival. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3524 / 3530
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Long-term results of acetabular reconstruction using irradiated allograft bone
    Green, C. M.
    Buckley, S. C.
    Hamer, A. J.
    Kerry, R. M.
    Harrison, T. P.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2018, 100B (11): : 1449 - 1454
  • [2] Early results of revision acetabular cup using antiprotrusio reconstruction rings and allografts
    Kmiec, Krzysztof
    Dorman, Tomasz
    Andrzej, Grzegorzewski
    Synder, Marek
    Kozlowski, Piotr
    Sibinski, Marcin
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2015, 49 (03) : 317 - 322
  • [3] Mid-term result of acetabular reconstruction using a Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement device with hydroxyapatite impaction
    Tanaka, Hidetatsu
    Chiba, Daisuke
    Yamada, Norikazu
    Tanaka, Masahiko
    Kuwahara, Yoshiyuki
    Itoi, Eiji
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS TRAUMA AND REHABILITATION, 2022, 29 (02)
  • [4] Mid-term results of acetabular reconstruction using a Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement device
    Hori, Junji
    Yasunaga, Yuji
    Yamasaki, Takuma
    Yoshida, Tomokazu
    Oshima, Seigo
    Yamasaki, Keiichiro
    Matsuo, Toshihiro
    Ochi, Mitsuo
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2012, 36 (01) : 23 - 26
  • [5] Acetabular reconstruction using morcellised bone with ring support - Medium term results at three to nine years
    Krishnan, Kamalakannan Murali
    Longstaff, Lee
    Partington, Paul
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA BELGICA, 2011, 77 (01): : 61 - 67
  • [6] Is Retention of the Acetabular Component at Revision Surgery a Long-Term Solution?
    Lieberman, Elizabeth
    Sasala, Lee
    Thornton, Tanner
    Barrack, Robert
    Nunley, Ryan
    Thapa, Susan
    Clohisy, John
    ARTHROPLASTY TODAY, 2023, 23
  • [7] Impaction bone grafting for acetabular reconstruction: mean 5.5-year results in Japanese patients
    Iwase, Toshiki
    Masui, Tetsuo
    Torii, Yukio
    Kouyama, Atsushi
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2010, 130 (04) : 433 - 439
  • [8] Long-term results of isolated acetabular revisions with reinforcement rings: a 10-to 15-year follow-up
    Marongiu, Giuseppe
    Podda, Daniele
    Mastio, Michele
    Capone, Antonio
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 29 (04) : 385 - 392
  • [9] Acetabular Revision Surgery with Tantalum Trabecular Metal Acetabular Cup for Failed Acetabular Cage Reconstruction with Bone Allografts: A Retrospective Study with Mid- to Long-Term Follow-Up
    Hsu, Chen-Heng
    Hu, Chih-Chien
    Chang, Chih-Hsiang
    Chang, Yu-Han
    Shih, Hsin-Nung
    Chen, Chun-Chieh
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (12)
  • [10] Mid-term results of acetabular reconstruction using a Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement device
    Junji Hori
    Yuji Yasunaga
    Takuma Yamasaki
    Tomokazu Yoshida
    Seigo Oshima
    Keiichiro Yamasaki
    Toshihiro Matsuo
    Mitsuo Ochi
    International Orthopaedics, 2012, 36 : 23 - 26