Support for assessment practice: developing the Assessment Design Decisions Framework

被引:61
作者
Bearman, Margaret [1 ]
Dawson, Phillip [2 ,4 ]
Boud, David [3 ,4 ,7 ]
Bennett, Sue [5 ]
Hall, Matt [6 ]
Molloy, Elizabeth [1 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Hlth Profess Educ & Educ Res HealthPEER, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Off Vice Provost Learning & Teaching, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
[3] Univ Technol Sydney, Fac Arts & Social Sci, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
[4] Deakin Univ, Ctr Res Assessment & Digital Learning, Geelong, Vic 3217, Australia
[5] Univ Wollongong, Sch Educ, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[6] Monash Univ, Fac Educ, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
[7] Middlesex Univ, Inst Work Based Learning, London N17 8HR, England
关键词
Assessment; higher education; educational design; decision-making; feedback; CONCEPTIONS; EDUCATION; FEEDBACK; WRITTEN; MODEL;
D O I
10.1080/13562517.2016.1160217
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
There are many excellent publications outlining features of assessment and feedback design in higher education. However, university educators often find these ideas challenging to realise in practice, as much of the literature focuses on institutional change rather than supporting academics. This paper describes the conceptual development of a practical framework designed to stimulate educators' thinking when creating or modifying assessments. We explain the concepts that underpin this practical support, including the notions of assessment decisions' and assessment design phases', as informed by relevant literature and empirical data. We also present the outcome of this work. The Assessment Design Decisions Framework. This provides key considerations in six categories: purposes, contexts, tasks, interactions, feedback processes and learning outcomes. By tracing the development of the Framework, we highlight complex ways of thinking about assessment that are relevant to those who design and deliver assessment to tertiary students.
引用
收藏
页码:545 / 556
页数:12
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [21] Changes in instructors' assessment thinking related to experimentation with new strategies
    Offerdahl, Erika G.
    Tomanek, Debra
    [J]. ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2011, 36 (07) : 781 - 795
  • [22] What is on your mind? Using the perceptual cycle model and critical decision method to understand the decision-making process in the cockpit
    Plant, Katherine L.
    Stanton, Neville A.
    [J]. ERGONOMICS, 2013, 56 (08) : 1232 - 1250
  • [23] If I was going there I wouldn't start from here: a critical commentary on current assessment practice
    Price, Margaret
    Carroll, Jude
    O'Donovan, Berry
    Rust, Chris
    [J]. ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2011, 36 (04) : 479 - 492
  • [24] Using the analytic rubric as an evaluation tool in nursing education: The positive and the negative
    Shipman, Debra
    Roa, Michelle
    Hooten, Jack
    Wang, Zhan Jenny
    [J]. NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2012, 32 (03) : 246 - 249
  • [25] A model for programmatic assessment fit for purpose
    van der Vleuten, C. P. M.
    Schuwirth, L. W. T.
    Driessen, E. W.
    Dijkstra, J.
    Tigelaar, D.
    Baartman, L. K. J.
    van Tartwijk, J.
    [J]. MEDICAL TEACHER, 2012, 34 (03) : 205 - 214