Support for assessment practice: developing the Assessment Design Decisions Framework

被引:61
作者
Bearman, Margaret [1 ]
Dawson, Phillip [2 ,4 ]
Boud, David [3 ,4 ,7 ]
Bennett, Sue [5 ]
Hall, Matt [6 ]
Molloy, Elizabeth [1 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Hlth Profess Educ & Educ Res HealthPEER, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Off Vice Provost Learning & Teaching, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
[3] Univ Technol Sydney, Fac Arts & Social Sci, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
[4] Deakin Univ, Ctr Res Assessment & Digital Learning, Geelong, Vic 3217, Australia
[5] Univ Wollongong, Sch Educ, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[6] Monash Univ, Fac Educ, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
[7] Middlesex Univ, Inst Work Based Learning, London N17 8HR, England
关键词
Assessment; higher education; educational design; decision-making; feedback; CONCEPTIONS; EDUCATION; FEEDBACK; WRITTEN; MODEL;
D O I
10.1080/13562517.2016.1160217
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
There are many excellent publications outlining features of assessment and feedback design in higher education. However, university educators often find these ideas challenging to realise in practice, as much of the literature focuses on institutional change rather than supporting academics. This paper describes the conceptual development of a practical framework designed to stimulate educators' thinking when creating or modifying assessments. We explain the concepts that underpin this practical support, including the notions of assessment decisions' and assessment design phases', as informed by relevant literature and empirical data. We also present the outcome of this work. The Assessment Design Decisions Framework. This provides key considerations in six categories: purposes, contexts, tasks, interactions, feedback processes and learning outcomes. By tracing the development of the Framework, we highlight complex ways of thinking about assessment that are relevant to those who design and deliver assessment to tertiary students.
引用
收藏
页码:545 / 556
页数:12
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], ASSESS EVAL HIGH EDU
  • [2] [Anonymous], STUDIES HIGHER ED
  • [3] [Anonymous], EFFECTS PROGRAMME AS
  • [4] Is the feedback in higher education assessment worth the paper it is written on? Teachers' reflections on their practices
    Bailey, Richard
    Garner, Mark
    [J]. TEACHING IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2010, 15 (02) : 187 - 198
  • [5] Understanding the design context for Australian university teachers: implications for the future of learning design
    Bennett, Sue
    Thomas, Lisa
    Agostinho, Shirley
    Lockyer, Lori
    Jones, Jennifer
    Harper, Barry
    [J]. LEARNING MEDIA AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 36 (02) : 151 - 167
  • [6] Borko H., 2008, Critical issues in mathematics education, P37, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-09673-5_4
  • [7] Boud D., 2000, STUD CONTIN EDUC, V22, P151, DOI [10.1080/713695728, DOI 10.1080/713695728]
  • [8] Boud D., 2010, Assessment 2020. Seven propositions for assessment reform in higher education
  • [9] Resilient health care: turning patient safety on its head
    Braithwaite, Jeffrey
    Wears, Robert L.
    Hollnagel, Erik
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2015, 27 (05) : 418 - 420
  • [10] CROSKERRY P., 2005, CAN J ANESTH, V52, pR1, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF03023077