Who should do what in environmental management? Twelve principles for allocating responsibilities

被引:36
作者
Mostert, Erik [1 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, NL-2628 CN Delft, Netherlands
关键词
Institutions; Decentralization; Polycentric governance; Integration; The Netherlands; Water; GOVERNANCE NETWORKS; SCALE; SOLIDARITY; SYSTEMS; DESIGN; STATES;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsci.2014.10.008
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In environmental management there is often discussion on the allocation of responsibilities. Such discussions can continue for a long time and can form an obstacle for effective action. In this article twelve normative principles for the allocation of responsibilities are identified, coming from three different sources: the arguments used in discussions on responsibilities, Dutch and European law, and the environmental management literature. The principles are (1) capacity, (2) lowest social costs, (3) causation, (4) interest, (5) scale, (6) subsidiarity, (7) structural integration, (8) separation, (9) solidarity, (10) transparency, (11) stability (but not standstill), and (12) acquired rights. These principles point to fundamental tensions in environmental management and sometimes conflict with each other. At the same time they may help to resolve conflicts by providing common points of reference that are independent from the often conflicting interests of the discussants. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 131
页数:9
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]  
Advies Heidemij, 1992, AANBEVELINGEN STEDEL
[2]   Common property institutions and sustainable governance of resources [J].
Agrawal, A .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2001, 29 (10) :1649-1672
[3]   Analyzing decentralized resource regimes from a polycentric perspective [J].
Andersson, Krister P. ;
Ostrom, Elinor .
POLICY SCIENCES, 2008, 41 (01) :71-93
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1990, GOVERNING COMMON
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1839, BESCHOUWING VAN DE D
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1990, INTEGRATED WATER MAN
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1990, INSTITUTIONS
[8]  
[Anonymous], TITLE ERROR
[9]  
Barber Nicholas., 2005, European Law Journal, V11, P308, DOI [10.1111/j.1468-0386.2005.00261.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1468-0386.2005.00261.X]
[10]  
Berkes F, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11